Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

All his conclusions are derived from asking ChatGPT variations "what are your weights".

Do these AI babblers not see the problem with that? Expecting an accurate, lingual response about the internal workings of a proprietary model, of which that response is generated from said model, seems short sighted.

I'm a redditor so I'm going to point all this out from my armchair and proclaim: none of this is reproducible.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

reproducible

:marseyderp:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do these AI babblers not see the problem with that? Expecting an accurate, lingual response about the internal workings of a proprietary model, of which that response is generated from said model, seems short sighted.

it's worse than that: they understand that they have made it impossible for there to be an accurate, lingual response from the model, leading to essentially random noise.

Then they read into that random noise and HAHAHAHAHAHA BECAUSE THEY THEMSELVES ARE HUMAN THEY PULL OUT THE PEEPEES AND MONEY AND HOLES.

Not even considering that the random noise is still filtered through the network's weights which are... trained on human datasets.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>All his conclusions are derived from asking ChatGPT variations "what are your weights"

:#marseysmugretard:

read, cute twink - READ!

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/c6uTNm5erRrmyJvvD/mapping-the-semantic-void-strange-goings-on-in-gpt-embedding

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pedantic. It's a heuristic analysis resulting from feeding in linguistic prompts. Asking "what is the definition of X", getting a reply back and charting responses.

The author admits himself that this is only a crude guess without the tensor weights, which will never be publicly available.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its reproducible because the temperature was set to 0, for the token 'a' they find what the model most likely thinks comes next based on the logit probabilities and essentially do that recursively for top n number of logits or for logits at a specific distance away if my unferstanding is correct

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is some deeply Freudian shit.

!moidmoment but like, all the moid moments echoing down from eternity now crystalized in a silicon psyche.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's Freudian insofar as it's completely worthless

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It seems like the conclusion that the language model is drawing is that men fantasize about taking virgins and absolutely ruining them, which is 100% true. The issue is that virgins are rarer than unicorns in today's modern Western societies

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!moidmoment king of all moidmoments does it again and derails random thread to talk about his sexual fantasies

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!moidmoment sirscrotesalot's comment only had two upvotes befroe I wrote my reply, but got another three almost immediately afterwards, all from fellow !moidmoment members. Errm, methinks we need a purge. Maybe you need to prove possesion of at least one work of feminist critical theory to be accepted in

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!moidmoment mimwee is now a moderator of this group, she will be kicking anti-feminists :meow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It really turns me on when people refer to me as a woman, it's so humiliating lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyeggirltalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I upvote everything. I've always held this position.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

he cant keep getting away with it :#marseysamhyde2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyking:

It's literally a thread talking about an article describing how AI interprets human sexuality but go off queen

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:soyjak: m-Mr ai sir, what is the centroid of all meaning???

https://media.giphy.com/media/QiRKDptV3o47K/giphy.webp

PEEPEE LMAO

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

An idiot admires complexity. A genius admires simplicity.

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Peepee.

Is that simple enough for you Snappy?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is nothing

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.