Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If the ads would be self-hosted and properly curated by the hosting site I wouldn't have a problem with them (just as I don't have much of a problem with print or tv ads). The specific problem with web ads is that most of the web made a deal with the devil: 3rd-party ad-networks which are directly injecting who-knows-what into webpages. Those ads are not just cheap click-bait-trash, but also potential malware vectors. At that point, ad-blocking essentially becomes a civil duty ;)

You usually get some response like this in threads like that one, the reasonable middle ground response that claims that ads would be okay if they were just a bit more X. They never seem to realise that the actual reasonable response is that advertising companies need to go bankrupt as soon as they can and advertisers must suffer as much as possible. They can whine as much as they like, I am never going to stop blocking ads.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they are just trying to moralize their shit. NOOO its not REALLY stealing because they corps have insurance, kinda thinking. if u dont like it then just dont visit their sites.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.