Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've been using Linux regularly for something like 10 years, and I still don't have any clue about why schzoids hate systemd :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Peanut gallery mostly.

They have to cook up grand conspiracies that Red Hat is an evil entity trying to make Linux worse.


Follower of Christ :marseyandjesus: Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It is, they paid off the gnometards to not add thumbnails to the file pickers because they didn't see a business case for it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the file picker issue was finally fixed when a guy went through the trouble of optimizing the legacy code. I believe that was always the problem- even if it was a gay reason.


Follower of Christ :marseyandjesus: Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

100% of the grievances are just mental gymnastics around the fact they don't like this smug frick

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17145202148660672.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

whomst

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Basically imagine your average HRT-chugging project maintainer/coder and now imagine that same person but from 20 years ago and that IBM/Red hat and all the linux distributions started backing him for some reason and made his software the de facto standard in their area

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyme:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Total clogger death.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Before systemd there was a very simple process (easy to review) running startup scripts (hard to review) handling boot with no central hub. Admittedly mayhem, then Systemd wants to be the overseer. One argument against systemd is you open yourself up to attacks against systemd which is much more complex. It's centralization vs. decentralization. You break systemd you have the machine, you break a startup script you might have a limited account.

Now Systemd as always presents the "we are secure enough that ALL our components will never threaten any system takeover" while expanding their systems to take over and not having a perfect security track record.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah but no one who actually uses Linux professionally cares cause systemd makes systems administration way easier


:#marseyviewerstaretalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not very linuxy and feels unfamiliar, that's the real reason.

Most people just like hate memes though

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why can't I dump a bash script in a folder like a Neanderthal :soyjaktantrum:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyme#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

systemd is on a feedback loop where it takes over more components/dictates a standard, is too big to remove so the rest of the ecosystem falls in line, making it even more entrenched and able to dictate further standards, and so on.

There are specific technical arguments around some of its decisions, and the expected drama over what political norms it might start enforcing, but the gist is no singular entity should be in its position to begin with.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it didn't make anime real.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When I started everything was SysV which I guess was too hard for some people. I like systemd just fine, if nothing else it's way better than upstart.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.