Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What a massive fricking L for Intel.

The lack of communication throughout this was terrible.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My team works pretty closely with Intel and we hired a bunch of senior ex-Intel engineers. Seems like kind of a mess to be honest, I'm not really sure what the future holds for them.

Consumer stuff is shifting to ARM, and based on what Apple has done with their silicone, I see zero reason to want to stay on x86. Not sure what will happen with server grade stuff, that's mostly still Intel from what I've seen, but I'm not really a hardware person.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah x86 is fine, there's plenty of reason for Windows and Linux users to stay on x86 right now. Apple's efficiency successes with the M-series is mostly the result of them having a complete top down control over the hardware and software so it's super well-optimized. x86 not being as efficient is mostly due to the separation between MS/Linux and the various chip and hardware manufacturers. The new Ryzen HX AI (ugh I know) and Lunar Lake x86 processors should close a lot of that gap with Apple, especially when it comes to more power demanding tasks.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think they can coast on x86 for a loooong time. Fact is a lot of economic juggernauts are built off the premise that a line-of-business app from 2007 written in C# that no one has the source to will continue working for decades.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah maybe that's enough to keep them afloat but unless they find a way to either innovate and stay on top of the CPU market or actually make headway on GPU development, they are in for tough times IMO.

No idea what it would take for them to close the gap with nvidia, but that's probably what I'd be wanting to do if I were them. It's probably more likely that nvidia goes and builds some crazy SOC onto an A100 and cuts them out of the GPU server market though.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You can run that shit on arm with a thin compatibility layer. faster than it ran in 2007 too, not a high bar. But the slowdown even for current day apps is minimal, that's really not a big issue unless you're gaming or something else that needs 100% of the hardware.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They managed to make sure it came out on a Friday though

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

All they had to do was offer like 100/200/300 off for owners of i3s/i5s/i7s respectfully

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You think? I mean the CPUs are simply broken, some reports are as high as 25% :marseymindblown:

I think they'll face some serious legal action if they were selling faulty products for two generations.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I FEEL like the USA is generally forgiving to companies when their customers are happy. I know regulatory wise and he'll even enterprise wise they are likely going to be fricked in the butt BUT as far as the average Joe goes? They know PCs are super sensitive machines and shits gonna happen, but if they're given a heavily subsidized new cpu even if still broken doesn't really matter. Just look at Nintendo and their joycons that are by design broken for almost a decade. Thy did like 4 years of free repairs and then everyone stopped caring

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.