Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm surprised it was a New York district judge who made the ruling

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

JED S. RAKOFF,

Vote Jed

he also cucked the SEC by making them do their job

"The S.E.C.'s long-standing policy—hallowed by history, but not by reason—of allowing defendants to enter into consent judgments without admitting or denying the underlying allegations, deprives the court of even the most minimal assurance that the . . . relief it is being asked to impose has any basis in fact. . . . In any case like this, that touches on the transparency of financial markets whose gyrations have so depressed our economy and debilitated our lives, there is an overriding public interest in knowing the truth."

https://fortune.com/2014/06/19/a-judges-moral-stand-is-rejected/

In 2011, Matt Taibbi wrote in Rolling Stone magazine, "Federal judge Jed Rakoff, a former prosecutor with the U.S. Attorney's office here in New York, is fast becoming a sort of legal hero of our time."

https://web.archive.org/web/20111111005810/http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/finally-a-judge-stands-up-to-wall-street-20111110#ixzz1iHrUuQzQ

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!followers look the only good judge :marseyshook:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jed!

:marseyclapping:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.