Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is that not a security issue? I guess no one crossing the border has ill intentions :marseynails:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Border" as defined by CBP means any part of the country that is within 100 miles of an international airport, ocean, or actual canadian or mexican border.

So, when the glowBIPOCs are talking about the "border" for search purposes, they mean anywhere shaded orange (ignore red) on this map and then some. Notice the entire fricking northeastern US is considered a "border zone".

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17221845484653978.webp

This ridiculously broad interpretation of the word "border" has enabled law enforcement agencies to do some really sketchy shit like seizing laptops and phones of US citizens flying domestically. This court ruling is about restricting their ability to do this.

@J pls pin


Current hyperfixation: https://i.rdrama.net/images/17146091388618665.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

also, this ruling should/could have an effect on standard/non-digital seaeches "near" the border. Dramatards should keep in mind thatbin many states civil asset forfeiture is still legal so many law enforcement arent necessarily incentivized to conduct these searches simply to find crime/criminals, often times they conduct these searches to seize money or valuables from people without even charging them with a crime and leaving them next to no recourse to get their property back. Again this happens to US citizens traveling domestically on the regular.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is good to know, thank you :marseynotes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Freedom > safety you kitty

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sorry my b, I did not read the article :marseystroke: and I thought this was in regards to immigration laws lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

just means more people will be denied entry or detained until a warrant

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes. And tough shit fed bois. Just be better at your job.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But it's soooooo haaaaaarrrddd!

:#marseycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17221891580709465.webp

>I only working this job cuz they build airports next to my house, not my problem you need to get somewhere

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Keep yourself safe

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyemojirofl: Sorry losers but you live within a hundred miles of the border so you don't actually have rights

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Or a navigable waterway

Also they let this search stand because it was done in GOOD FAITH

@BigBussyHunter

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As long as it's used against smelly foreigners alone it's absolutely defensible


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17035381209726467.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm surprised it was a New York district judge who made the ruling

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

JED S. RAKOFF,

Vote Jed

he also cucked the SEC by making them do their job

"The S.E.C.'s long-standing policy—hallowed by history, but not by reason—of allowing defendants to enter into consent judgments without admitting or denying the underlying allegations, deprives the court of even the most minimal assurance that the . . . relief it is being asked to impose has any basis in fact. . . . In any case like this, that touches on the transparency of financial markets whose gyrations have so depressed our economy and debilitated our lives, there is an overriding public interest in knowing the truth."

https://fortune.com/2014/06/19/a-judges-moral-stand-is-rejected/

In 2011, Matt Taibbi wrote in Rolling Stone magazine, "Federal judge Jed Rakoff, a former prosecutor with the U.S. Attorney's office here in New York, is fast becoming a sort of legal hero of our time."

https://web.archive.org/web/20111111005810/http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/finally-a-judge-stands-up-to-wall-street-20111110#ixzz1iHrUuQzQ

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jed!

:marseyclapping:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Foreigners shouldn't have any rights and should be subjected to cavity searches upon crossing the border.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Worse would be an anal intrusion rod that doesn't even serve even a pretext of a purpose.

"Step here and bend over for the anal cavity rod."

"You mean search?"

"No, we're just sticking this up your hole. The cavity search already happened by X-ray."

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.