Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Online :marseyidio3: dating :marseyitsrigged: is just manifest of what happens in real life.

The top 20% most attractive men get 80% of the likes. Men of average attractiveness is out of luck on dating :marseyitsrigged: apps and they should :marseynorm: not use dating :marseyitsrigged: apps.

Average men will swipe right :marseymoreyouknow: on below average women :marseyblackfeminismdenied: (and above) - because it's easy and free to shoot :marseyfloch: your shot.

Therefore, even below average women :marseysuffragette: will get seemingly unlimited likes.

These below average women :marseyharpooner: will then pick and choose :marseyvalentine: likes from the top 20%. These women :marseyhearnoevil: will also wonder :marseysphinx: why they can't get these top 20% guys to commit to them or ask them out on a date. It's because these men have many options. These above average men will often only want something :marseysmugface: casual :marseywillnever: with below average women.

This is why women :marseyblops2chadcel2: will say there :marseycheerup: are no "good" men on dating :marseyitsrigged: apps despite :marseybipocattentionseeker: having thousands of likes. Eventually, these women :marseyuterus: will "settle" for someone less than what they hoped. In reality, these women :marseyblops2chadcel2: are just settling for men of equal :marseyjustice: attractiveness to themselves.

:marseyhesright: which is why no sane person :marseywall: uses dating :marseyitsrigged: apps :marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I use them to DM pictures of my cat. My friends get annoyed when I keep sending them pics but some hot stranger in New York finds him cute and fascinating.

It's easier if you set your preferences to gay because you get more matches.

!cats

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>"online dating manifest of real life"

>cites pareto principle

I didnt have to read very far to know this person rarely leaves his room.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Third, make the app look like a CRM.

The dating cycle is the same thing as the sales cycle. Find leads, connect, qualify leads, present, overcome objections, close the deal, and nurture.

I have never used Salesforce, but I imagine the experience is not similar to a swiping based dating app. You want to present likely leads, and design the app in such a way to discourage non unique messages. Part of this involves a good chunk of freeform text on your profile that people can use as conversation openers.

Now you are on to the qualify leads step. If you aren't agreeing on a time to meet in the first ten messages, this is a dead lead. While leaving reviews for people goes too far, the best predictor of if someone will meet with you is the ratio of meets/conversations. I would make this public on the app, similar to Airbnb's response time.

>ignore the simple issue of women on dating apps not being interested in average or below men, believe that overengineering and making things needlessly complicated will somehow magically fix everything

is this something neurodivergent people do a lot? I feel like it might be

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>"CRM for Kitty" will solve issues with my repulsive personality

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's just autism from the incel 80/20 theories tho

Women will say no to most men not because they only want the best men, but because they're sexually and romantically uninterested in strangers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

?

It isn't theory, it's historical fact

But it's more like 75/25

https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17233802790119998.webp

men who reproduced on left, women who reproduced on right

Women are not sexually disinterested in strangers, they're sexually disinterested in strangers below a 7/10. Any guy who's been both above and below that ephemeral line knows how absurd the difference in public attention is. A stranger once told me she worked at the clothing store down the street if I need help trying on pants.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Did women not watch Mr. Rogers? A stranger's just a friend you haven't met. :marseywholesome:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Charge men money per month. Only men. Every club promoter understands this. You don't want your club to be a sausage fest, similarly, you don't want your dating app to be a sausage fest.

Sites have been doing this since forever. It doesn't seem to make much difference.

Part of this is going to involve people getting over themselves with respect to attractiveness. Think of every couple you know. With almost no exceptions, they are fairly similar looks wise. The bottom date the bottom, the middle date the middle, and the most attractive date the most attractive. You will end up dating your looks match.

They actually don't, people mostly fashion match, people into fashion go out with people into fashion. If you ever look closely at those 'beautiful' women, they're usually pretty man-faced but with a ton of makeup to cover it up.

(btw, why doesn't Instagram allow me to filter my inbox by male/female? another purposefully crippled front end).

What social media companies do is quite clever actually. They very intentionally don't let you filter by gender at all. THAT is what makes women use the site, not fee reductions nor promiscuity filtering etc. Women use sites to date that give them some kind of plausible deniability that they're not on the site to find s*x or relationships. For some reason no typical dating site ever understands that and they tie themselves in knots trying to think of a way to improve the site systematically without considering the psychological tendencies of their users.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

OkCupid had compatibility questions

No, it had what was basically a shitlib politics test.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>app for hooking up

>complain about how it's a bad dating app

the app is there so people can find a frick buddy and pretend they're looking to be dating, the cope is real

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The California tech dweeb cities are less than 5% of America's population but responsible for 90% of American :soyjaktantrum: "I can't get any kitty" :soycry: posts polluting the internet.

Just move somewhere that isn't a sausage fest.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What is it about Apple that makes chuds seethe so much? Is it envy?

To add more salt in the wounds of these chuds… did Apple just BTFO all the chud's iToddler bullshit?

>Dismantles arguments about how Macs are useless because "MUH VIDYA"

>Dismantles arguments that iPhones are walled gardens as many methods of sideloading existing

>Explains how ARM architecture allows Macs to perform better than competing Windows devices while using less power

>Explains the entire history of Apple devices BTFOing the competition

>Explains how repairability is the fools strawman issue

How do (You) refute all these arguments? They literally actually have the brain to back their arguments up instead of the chud "iTODDLER" + red hair tranime pics.

>inb4 sage

>inb4 DURRRRRR ITODDLER

>inb4 someone says Linux is superior because muh schïzo privacy feature or like that

Actually refute these arguments… I'll wait.

Snapshots:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41214096:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.