Posting because it's interesting but also:
Zak 1 hour ago
I have mixed feelings here. On the other hand, there's a trend for social media platforms lately to downrank anything that's not advertiser-friendly whether it's Facebook posts containing profanity or Youtube videos about guns. I don't think tech billionaires suing each other about it is an ideal resolution, but I don't like this trend.
afsdgiadnion 1 hour ago [flagged] [dead]
Musk is so personally odious that people would boycott Twitter even if it were a flower shop. He has literally praised Adolf Hitler for his handling of Jews. He's a Nazi.
This is not, primarily, about social media moderation.
afsdgiadnion 1 hour ago [flagged] [dead]
This really isn't complicated. Musk accused Jews (by name) of conspiring against the white race. He praised Adolf Hitler (by name) for his handling of Jews. Advertisers panicked and fled en masse. No court is going to compel advertisers to fund neo-Nazi propaganda.
kevinh 1 hour ago
So this non-lawyer read the initial complaint, looked into two cases, and thinks he has a meaningful understanding of how the lawsuit is going to go? Why is some random layman's opinion given any weight here?
dangpeepee 52 minutes ago [dead]
Everyone's opinion has value libertarian c*nt.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Don't ruin the vibe bro
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It sounds like something he would do when he's high but it also sounds like something leftoids would make up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context