Posting because it's interesting but also:
Zak 1 hour ago
I have mixed feelings here. On the other hand, there's a trend for social media platforms lately to downrank anything that's not advertiser-friendly whether it's Facebook posts containing profanity or Youtube videos about guns. I don't think tech billionaires suing each other about it is an ideal resolution, but I don't like this trend.
afsdgiadnion 1 hour ago [flagged] [dead]
Musk is so personally odious that people would boycott Twitter even if it were a flower shop. He has literally praised Adolf Hitler for his handling of Jews. He's a Nazi.
This is not, primarily, about social media moderation.
afsdgiadnion 1 hour ago [flagged] [dead]
This really isn't complicated. Musk accused Jews (by name) of conspiring against the white race. He praised Adolf Hitler (by name) for his handling of Jews. Advertisers panicked and fled en masse. No court is going to compel advertisers to fund neo-Nazi propaganda.
kevinh 1 hour ago
So this non-lawyer read the initial complaint, looked into two cases, and thinks he has a meaningful understanding of how the lawsuit is going to go? Why is some random layman's opinion given any weight here?
dangpeepee 52 minutes ago [dead]
Everyone's opinion has value libertarian c*nt.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It sounds like something he would do when he's high but it also sounds like something leftoids would make up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Don't ruin the vibe bro
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Can everyone just come together and admit this "advertiser friendly" shit is r-slurred? If you like to watch Nazis and you see an ad for Honda next to it, you won't think any less of Honda. You're someone who wanted to watch that shit in the first place and they're just trying to sell to you. The ad is the same no matter where it is.
The only "brand damage" comes from activists screeching and trying to draw attention with false outrage, but they are just annoying. Who fricking cares whose ad is beside what and gets chud cooties because of it?
Literally just admit nobody cares and we could stop having abominations like "unalive" creep into the dictionary. Advertising is insufferable enough without having it try to inflict completely unnecessary damage on culture and language. At least stick to selling me pointless shit that no one needs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Cartels aren't real chud
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What is it about Apple that makes chuds seethe so much? Is it envy?
To add more salt in the wounds of these chuds… did Apple just BTFO all the chud's iToddler bullshit?
How do (You) refute all these arguments? They literally actually have the brain to back their arguments up instead of the chud "iTODDLER" + red hair tranime pics.
Actually refute these arguments… I'll wait.
Snapshots:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41215927:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
this afsdgiadnion dude is the least obvious hasbara neighbor ever
jewish lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context