The maintainer for the bcachefs
filesystem sends a last-minute patch into the upcoming 6.11 tree, claiming that its an important bug fix and it cannot wait to be merged into 6.12. Linus is not happy because the patch is quite large and it also seems to do more than a simple bugfix, adding risk of breaking things into a release that's almost ready to come out.
Here's a phoronix article giving a bit more explaination: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linus-Torvalds-Bcachefs-Regrets
Some random people in the Phoronix thread fight each other, discussing if it was right for Linus to scold the maintainer like this: https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/software/general-linux-open-source/1487364-linus-torvalds-begins-expressing-regrets-merging-bcachefs/page17
On a related note, you might have also heard about bcachefs
this week because the Debian maintainer for the bcachefs-tools
dropped the package, citing that its way too difficult to package now due to Rust: https://jonathancarter.org/2024/08/29/orphaning-bcachefs-tools-in-debian/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
why are linux tards so obsesses about new filesystems? Literally noone cares about them , with an ssd all are basically fast enough.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Idk what file system my fedora machine uses lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Multiple probably. FAT and Extended
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
it's btrfs. It became the new default back in 2021 or so.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
WRONG.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's btrfs now and that's all that matters. Cute twink. Cute twink. Cute twink. Cute twink.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I like the extended filesystem, they extended it four times. Stores all my files and doesn't give me any shit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I've grown accustomed to btrfs's various quality of life features, to the point where I don't really want to go back to ext4.
Reflinks, subvolumes, snapshots, online resizing, compression to a certain extent.
Now watch it betray me and eat my data. That's what I get for defending something on the internet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Slight necropost but when btrfs fricks up it fricks up bad.
It also has a notable performance hit but like you said the features it has make it worth it. It saved me several times when I first started using OpenSUSE.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context