Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao amerilards

Did you know when Americans buy a pillow they agree that the company is legally allowed to give them malware

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Legally unenforceable, they do that to scare r-slurs off.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not quite. While not really legal, you would not be arguing about this in a real court. The terms contain a binding arbitration clause, so you'd be arguing in a privately run 'court' of which MyPillow is a customer.

Not only will they be biased against you, but they will award lower damages if forced to rule in your favor

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You absolutely could take this to a real court. The real courts determine if the forced arbitration is binding then shunt you off to one if it is. The company you are suing can't just ignore the court if they find the forced arbitration unenforceable.

Edit: to add, Congress is chipping away at forced arbitration anyway, so a lot of companies are going to have to clean their act up.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why is congress chipping away at it if it's so easy to get abitration clauses thrown out :marseythonk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because they aren't always invalid. For example any time a service is provided. So basically all tech companies have enforceable forced arbitration. Also employees for any company, which looks bad for Dems. California passed a law but it got enjoined.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyupvote2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because it's still a hassle for the courts to have to tell the company their TOS isn't worth the paper it's written on and have them kick and scream because they want to force arbitration so they can get their way automatically.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

MY PILLOW MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE OPERATION OF THE SITE, THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE SITE CONTENTS, OR THAT EMAILS SENT FROM MY PILLOW ARE FREE OF MALWARE OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS. YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THE SITE IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK.

lmfao what the frick

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most sophisticated rightoid cybersecurity program.

Ironically, the best cybersecurity professionals I know are literal redpilled Fuentes-tier rightoids one of whom was Fedposting about showing up to J6 as a Federal employee:#marseyxdorbit:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Being paranoid about getting hacked and spied on by Chinese and Russians as a necessity probably spreads to other parts of your life.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Seems like a standard tos boilerplate.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is why I open all my products from the bottom like Steve1989MREInfo to preserve the packaging in case it becomes collectable

:#marseybigbrain:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm pretty sure forced arbitration is not enforceable for a product, only a service.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tell that to ford

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

why would a companies lawyers still bother to add the text?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Scare away people who don't know the law. See: warranty void if removed stickers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is that because they didn't put enough glue on the stickers and they just fell off after a day?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What if the sticker was holding something in place.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They would have to prove the customer removed the sticker and that it didn't fall off naturally.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sometimes it's because there's no reason not to so they hope it deters people from suing, sometimes it's because they just grabbed a boilerplate block-o-legalese from somewhere and it was included.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not like there's a penalty or cost of being wrong about it, they just end up in court same as if it wasn't there.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Corporate lawyers need to justify their salaries and will come up with all sorts of shit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is the cyberpunk future. You have a product dispute with Experia Ventures LLC DBA Vital Collagen Subsidiary of P&G. CPG Affiliates PMG controls MegaBlock 6 Sodo Redevelopment District and the court system. You have contracted IRCG Holding Corp for tactical nuclear weapons and a conditional loan to raise a fighting force from the class of litigants to seize the corporate HQ and replace the ethereum smart contract with a Sneedcoin Legal Blockchain that will redistribute assets to the affected class. It's D-Day- and this liability dispute will be decided in blood and irradiated steel- one way or another

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#soyconsoomer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unenforceable as frick. I really wish the department of justice, commerce, or whoever that falls under would start meaningfully and proactively going after companies that try to pull this shit. I'm glad comfy chair man got some free video content though.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • HailVictory1776 : Because he's an Israeli Jew from NYC heavy into real estate

This guy sure seems to know a lot about male feminist behaviors….

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I agree to be bound :carpwhip#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

OMG imagine using that disgusting language over RUST. As a proud rustacean, I'm going to inform you: that's blasphemy. You can do better. Grab cargo and start using a beautiful memory managed, statically typed, comfortable yet low level language with a spectacular packaging system. No more memory leaks. No more makefiles. End the weird bugs caused by unrequested type casting. Easily find libraries. AND ALL OF THAT IS BLAZING FAST (at C/cpp-level speeds - yay compiled langs and llvm c:). Why wouldn't you? The syntax is spectacular as well; extremely clean, much better than anything else out there. Those match statements are so extremely pleasant, and the looping conventions are orgasmic. And the compiler is the most useful and polite you'll come across; no more endlessly scrolling segmentation fault and template errors. It's amazing and I love it and you should switch now because it's far superior to literally everything else, all those gross languages you're used to using. Come to rust and you'll never look back, it's so versatile and cleeeeean. Graydon Hoare is literally a god. The rust book is my bible. this is my religion now. USE RUST

Snapshots:

https://mastodon.social/@Wraithe/113058482791600044:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.