Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao amerilards

Did you know when Americans buy a pillow they agree that the company is legally allowed to give them malware

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

MY PILLOW MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE OPERATION OF THE SITE, THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE SITE CONTENTS, OR THAT EMAILS SENT FROM MY PILLOW ARE FREE OF MALWARE OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS. YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THE SITE IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK.

lmfao what the frick

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most sophisticated rightoid cybersecurity program.

Ironically, the best cybersecurity professionals I know are literal redpilled Fuentes-tier rightoids one of whom was Fedposting about showing up to J6 as a Federal employee:#marseyxdorbit:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Being paranoid about getting hacked and spied on by Chinese and Russians as a necessity probably spreads to other parts of your life.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Seems like a standard tos boilerplate.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Legally unenforceable, they do that to scare r-slurs off.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not quite. While not really legal, you would not be arguing about this in a real court. The terms contain a binding arbitration clause, so you'd be arguing in a privately run 'court' of which MyPillow is a customer.

Not only will they be biased against you, but they will award lower damages if forced to rule in your favor

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You absolutely could take this to a real court. The real courts determine if the forced arbitration is binding then shunt you off to one if it is. The company you are suing can't just ignore the court if they find the forced arbitration unenforceable.

Edit: to add, Congress is chipping away at forced arbitration anyway, so a lot of companies are going to have to clean their act up.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why is congress chipping away at it if it's so easy to get abitration clauses thrown out :marseythonk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because they aren't always invalid. For example any time a service is provided. So basically all tech companies have enforceable forced arbitration. Also employees for any company, which looks bad for Dems. California passed a law but it got enjoined.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyupvote2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because it's still a hassle for the courts to have to tell the company their TOS isn't worth the paper it's written on and have them kick and scream because they want to force arbitration so they can get their way automatically.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.