Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What the frick is going on in America?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

he makes some good points butt he overstates them and his examples are extreme hyperbole. The case he is talking about is abput people who were hirt when their uber crashed not being able to sue Uber directly in court because it had a "forced" arbitration agreement, where you agree that if youre suing them for sometuing having to do with the app that you agree to a certain jurisidction and special court for the ruling to be rendered. Arbitration isnt magically rigged against plaintiffs and they run by judges and theres still certain ethics, just no appeal and its cheaper. Also not all clauses in a contract are enforceable against all suers in all situations. The lawyers who draw these contracts do so to maximize liability mitigstion for their client and are often overbroad. No "release of liability" can prevent you from being sued for doing something illegal, or protect you from being sued when you personally were willfully or wontonly negligent no matter what the contract says. Hes pointing ro clauses in the contraft that havemt been successfully enforced at the end of the video. And in the begining he talks about the disney case which was dropped likely due the unenfoecebility of that clause in the contrsct and not just the bad press.

https://apnews.com/article/disney-allergy-death-lawsuit-b66cd07c6be2497bf5f6bce2d1f2e8d1

!slotsmb100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ma'am we've been over this before. You need to stop.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/VF_ZWG_ckQYAAAAx/never-real-housewives-of-beverly-hills.webp

!superheroes

!slotsmb200

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Arbitration isnt magically rigged against plaintiffs and they run by judges and theres still certain ethics, just no appeal and its cheaper.

of frick off lmao forced arbitration wouldn't be a thing if there were any semblance of actual fairness to it, it's 100% biased in favor of the company and they are NOT actual courts of law

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Courts wouldnt be a thing if there were any semblance of actual fairness to it, its 100% biased in favor of the government and they are NOT actual courts of Common Magna Carta Admiralty Law

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marse#yjurisdiction:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

why would companies stipulate forced arbitration if it did not benefit them?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

first of all "forced arbitration" is a dumb phrase when both parties agreed to it c9ntrsftually, two them not being courts doesnt make them not regulated machinations of law governed by lawyers just like courts are. Theyre just cheaper and more limited and...oh yeah you have to agree to it int he first place to be bound by them.

!slotsmb100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

c9ntrsftually

:#marseystroke:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Positive covfefe

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If that agreement is a requirement for something else it's reasonable to call it "forced". two most of that "regulation" comes from the fact that the parties get to agree on which arbitration to use beforehand, which, see one.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If that agreement is a requirement for something else it's reasonable to call it "forced".

every agreement requires comcessions/actions of each party, by your logic their payment for the service is "forced" and the companies are comitting robbery :marseyrobber:

!slotsmb100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

By using this vending machine, you agree to get your peepee amputated.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

great example of a contractual clause that would be unenforceable

!slots100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!slots100

:marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!slots185

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm totally sure you read every EULA you've ever signed in full lmao.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

that doesnt invalidate, contradict, or even counter anything that Ive said. I dont see how you could even suggest that makes me a hippocryt based on that.

https://media.tenor.com/VMFVQ9cXo6sAAAAx/anime-suzumiya.webp

!slotsmb100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So you're admitting that you don't read all of every EULA? Case closed.

https://media.tenor.com/PY4Lt8VODy8AAAAx/the-amanda-show-dancing-lobsters.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/GIVLitDIxr8AAAAx/breaking-bad-walter-white.webp

!slots100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah it's cause civil courts are unfairly biased to the plaintiff. Juries are r-slurred.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Will the arbitration company favor its customer, Uber, or the party Uber pays the arbitration company to fend off? This is so tough

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TechChads rule over the poors

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A complete failure of government


:!marseybooba:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When Americans buy a pillow they agree that the company is legally allowed to give them malware :marseylaughpoundfist:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

youre so fricking dumb

!slots200

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

By opening my comment, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions:

USER CONTENT INCLUDED ON THIS SITE IS PROVIDED BY rdrama ON AN "AS IS," "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS, WITHOUT REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND. @IanMurdock MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE OPERATION OF THE SITE, THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE SITE CONTENTS, OR THAT COMMENTS SENT FROM @IanMurdock ARE FREE OF MALWARE OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

good luck enforcing that, dumb frick. If you hypothetically gave anyone malware intentionally youd be guilty of crimes and those people would still be able to sue you. Weve discussed this before and if you dont get it at this point then its obbious that youre a troll and a dumb one at that

!slots200

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Addendum: you also agree not to be a side voting b-word :marseyfluffyannoyed:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/n1Idy-WMdcoAAAAx/case-in-point-charles-reese.webp

!slots100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

r-slurs agree to shit they didn't even read smh

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.