emoji-award-marseydisgusted
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How is this not a blatent 1A issue? Public officials cannot just have "no chuds allowed" policies lol.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because the formal reason they rejected it is because the DoD wants to class all launches as being for military purposes even when there's no military equipment being launched.

Which is actually fair. It honestly sounds like a bribery investigation at the air force would be needed.

Yes, I read the article. :#marseybottom:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Because the formal reason they rejected it is because the DoD wants to class all launches as being for military purposes even when there's no military equipment being launched.

Yeah, but if the reason underlying this finding is "Elon is a chud therefore he can't contribute to any legitimate defense objective" then it's still a problem. It's unclear why this commission should even be empowered to second-guess the DoD like this?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ethically yes. but imo the material reason is still correct as well.

In an ideal world spaceX would still be denied the permit and the councilors would be shot into the sun on a ULA rocket.

And heads would roll at the chair force for corruption, probably.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Loser :marseyl:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyrope: i know

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/e-tu1KPkCucAAAAx/the-simpsons-homer-simpson.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseycrying:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It is, but this has never been a problem for leftoids. Political grandstanding is more important to them than the constitution

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How many tax dollars have been wasted slapping down nonsense laws on both sides. Wingcuckery is a sin of the first degree.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They should fine 1A violators, personally. It would solve a lot of problems.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.