Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I remember how "master" and "slave" were banned a few years back in information technology context and people cheered that ban. And surprise surprise, the same mechanism of arbitrary bans can be turned 180 degrees. And it appears that if the only criteria is a superficial offense at the established word unrelated to the imaginary offense, then many different people can use that same mechanism to ban or attack whatever they want. From all sides of the political spectrum. Who knew, right?:)

PS: I'm against any word bans with a very few extreme exceptions. Blanket bans for whatever random person deems offensive inevitably led to this^. Like clockwork, every single time.

Personally, I started replacing the terms 'master' and 'slave' throughout the codebase with 'cracka' and 'neighbor'.

I think it's a good thing because it reminds of the oppression that I cause BIPOCs everyday as an evil ytoid.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735397835BTbCkGwWb5B-VQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I did the same thing but with "top" and "bottom".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

smh power bottoms forgotten once again

e, almost forgot: sub tops too


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735397835BTbCkGwWb5B-VQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sub tops don't exist. They're just bottoms in denial :marseysteaming:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They do exist. They're moids that solely exist to keep the peepee alive. Otherwise they're pretty useless.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735397835BTbCkGwWb5B-VQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

sub tops too

:#surejan:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@tempest yikes on bikes fix your subtopmisia


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735397835BTbCkGwWb5B-VQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Blacklist"/"Whitelist" to "Denylist"/"Allowlist" are even more r-slurred imo.

Especially since the etymology of "blacklist" has literally nothing to do with black people.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The real offense is the idea that language changes like this have any impact on the real world. They so desperately want to believe that language has this power, because it offers such an easy way for them to control how people think if it does.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no but it feels exclusionary

codercels and their lack of interpersonal skills smh this is why CoCs exist


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735397835BTbCkGwWb5B-VQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Suck my CoC :marseyscoot:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

nice long CoC :marseybeandrool:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735397835BTbCkGwWb5B-VQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

For some reason :marseytrain:s always have the biggest CoCs.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no they exist because of :!marseytrain:s and females and females

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm going to bring back neighborrdly

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I prefer Do'right and Nign't

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I honestly didn't mind changing master to main since its less letters

I do hate when people try to use 'parent' and 'child' tho like processes are not families!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why not? You can kill them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm quite certain that there are several jokes about killing children in the linux source code lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I replaced spawning/killing terminology with pro-abortion terminology to own the chuds

abort(fetus: 2_minute_old_child);


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735397835BTbCkGwWb5B-VQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>starting a type name with a numeral

that's an automatic PR reject bb

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

fricking merge nazi


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735397835BTbCkGwWb5B-VQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We were forced to use 'primary' and 'secondary' in a context of a scheduler and a worker configuration, its butt to describe.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So it could do a failower and have the worker take over scheduling?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, it couldn't do that, which is why it was stupid. We had one machine that did scheduling and some logic to check if pipelines needed to be run, and then told the actual workers to do shit. Primary and secondary is absolutely the wrong terms

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Candy's Love Song (DKC).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.