Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I remember how "master" and "slave" were banned a few years back in information technology context and people cheered that ban. And surprise surprise, the same mechanism of arbitrary bans can be turned 180 degrees. And it appears that if the only criteria is a superficial offense at the established word unrelated to the imaginary offense, then many different people can use that same mechanism to ban or attack whatever they want. From all sides of the political spectrum. Who knew, right?:)

:smugjak: When you say they were "banned", do you mean a handful of companies voluntarily decided to stop using those words internally and published blog posts about it? I don't recall it going any further than that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>It isn't happening and if it is it's a good thing

:#marseyitsallsotiresome:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>a handful of companies

STRAGMAN could technically be considered "a handful of companies".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Title Theme (Diddy Kong Racing).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.