Silicon Valley built the modern world.
— John Shedletsky (@Shedletsky) February 3, 2025
Why shouldn't we run it?
Silicon Valley built the modern world. Why shouldn't we run it?
https://x.com/Shedletsky/status/1886563357249212846
- 76
- 75
Now playing: Bonus Room Blitz (DKC).mp3
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because STEMcels are literal r-slurs at virtually everything except the tiny niche they work in lol
I love when STEMcels have to take phil of science classes because it really exposes just how poor their critical thinking is
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Same applies to military generals which is why governments taken over by them keep failing after 4-5 years unless your economy was already below 200 USD per capita.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Eisenhower was bad?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Or George Washington?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Eisenhower and George Washington were great general-presidents because they were AMERICAN!
!burgers, @ElverGalarga and @coolcarp117 need a
regimebrain change pronto!Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Eisenhower was one of the good ones because he pointed out the corporate capture of the American government or something like that, but he was never a military general that took over by force.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well yeah, military juntas are bad.
Some military leaders are fine provided they're ruling with the consent of the ruled.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
t. art history major
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Could it be worse than the theater kids and homework brats that are currently doing it?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It is worst in general because while humanitycels generally know they are garbage at math and hard science, STEMcels assume they are god's gift to history/philosohy/sociology/etc
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
1) History is made up anyways and getting it wrong won't change the success of modern day humanity.
2) Philosophy is a made up job and the last answers that could impact normal humans from philosophy were given out by the 20th century and now they are just playing around with symbols which a mathematician can do better than them with better results anyways.
3) Sociology is made up and psychology has more real life impact in comparison.
A better argument would be that when people treat other people like machines the system is on the path to collapse.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Very true. In my nerd herd I'd say 4/5s have almost psychologically high egos.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
People who voluntarily self-sort into "stem majors" or "humanities majors" as a personality replacement are uninteresting and generally bad at all fields. Taking mutual inspiration from both makes you better at both.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is true and very obnoxious, if a friend of mine wasn't a literal philosophy PhD I'd probably be somewhat similar. It's frustrating because it's like trying to describe a color to a blind person, STEMcels almost always don't even have a concept of what they're missing, and in this metaphor the blind person is claiming they already know what all the colors look like.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Philosophy is a hedonistic waste of time, all the great philosophers you suck off were massive losers and cute twinks, Nietzsche was a incel, Schopenhauer believed in magic and Kant sounds like c*nt
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Case in point lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Art is gay literature is gay philosophy it's all a waste of time
true intellectual pursuit is working on the Juicero Press
!nonchuds
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Those are all shit-tier materialist philosophers tho
trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yikes low EQ detected
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Socrates deserved it by being annoying and having an ugly face
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nietzsche worshipping incel detected
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More like perma virgin epistemology reading Nelson Goodman for no reason LOL ITS GRUE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Look out guys we've got a Wittgensteinian!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hume was based and empiricist
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Plato was the last great philosopher. Everybody since have been cucks trying to copy him ( only the easy "intellectual parts" to gain value in a society. )
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Diogenes solos easily
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Diogenes wasn't a philosopher. He was a public masturbator who would bully philosophers in his free time because that is how big losers they were that a public jerking r-slur could bully them badly enough to be written about in history books.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
incel wizards are based tho?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's called 'hubris'
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
arts/humanities student cope !codecels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Research methods and philosophy of science were required parts of my (honors) STEM curriculum.
My other degree is basically in philosophy. Yet, I didn't see a massive gap in the reasoning skills of the STEM folks that I saw in the research methods/reasoning classes. Then again, it was only the cream of the students in the department that had to take them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Cope, many STEMchads have a variety of interests and skills and can run circles around Humanitards when they want to. Humanitards are the ones studying shit no one cares about because they're too dumb for the high value majors
Its an easy A no one with a brain takes seriously lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
what if they like literature or whatever and don't want to be a number molester?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
At least they have something they're not r-slurred at, unlike EdDs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context