Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Show us your tits and we won't have to make AI videos of them

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyconfused: she already did full nude scenes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What movie?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseycoomer2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Some low budget euro movie. She played the same kind of space alien as the one that killed Tasha Yar in ST:TNG but it's pretending to be a slut who fricks around in awkward improvised-dialogue scenes for some reason. Maybe she thought nobody would see it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well...can we see the video? Is it actually viral? Because I haven't heard of it and I'm in a lot of coomer communities.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Apparently it's not porn

https://instagram.com/p/DF8IKiLIfXD/

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>not porn

You can do that with deepfakes? Why?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:ma#rseyvibing: :space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space::space:

I stand with Israel, after they surrender ahah @H

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Woah I guess they do control Hollywood… Maybe Ye was onto something.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She's over FORTY now holy shit she was hot in Iron Man (2008) but now she's somebody's mother :marseyyikes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If it exists it's gonna go viral now it was all her plan. Evil scheming w*man...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Scarlett Johansson calls for ban on photoshopping her head onto a pair of big fat tits" is the same level of r-slurred but because AI haters can't circlejerk over it I guess we have to pretend that it matters now

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is not about porn you r-slur.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Arch GNU/Linux. The packages are extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of pacman most of the packages will go over a typical user's head. There's also AUR, which is deftly woven into your system - its personal philosophy draws heavily from Richard Stallman literature, for instance. The true Arch GNU/Linux users understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these packages, to realize that they're not just free software- they say something deep about GNU/Linux. As a consequence people who dislike GNU/Linux truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Stallman's existencial catchphrase "Free software, free society," which itself is a cryptic reference to Torvald's epic Linux kernel. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Stallman's genius unfolds itself on their monitors. What fools... how I pity them. 😂 And yes by the way, I DO have a Arch GNU/Linux tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.

Snapshots:

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1inxxuc/scarlett_johansson_calls_for_deepfake_ban_after/:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.