Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There isn't a cobol epoch, it varies by system. It's like saying c++ has an epoch when it actually varies based on the system running the code, that's why sensible programmers use an iso date not epoch.

It's likely this is a null representation though. 150 is unusually round, it's likely the max for that field and they represent nulls as max values.

Given Musk doesn't understand composite keys either he could also just be highly r-slurred. OA fraud is one of the easiest frauds to detect because the program rules are so simple, OIG doesn't even bother breaking it out. DI is the much larger issue but also expensive to prevent.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

BIPOC stfu. 150 is round because who would say "we have people more than 152 years old still collecting social security", you just round when speaking. And why would the max be 150, that's r-slurred. Just use 255 if you're gonna have a max. And do you really think the person DB has an integer age? So it just increments by one on each person's birthday? Why the frick would you have that, instead of computing the age as today - birthday?

that's why sensible programmers use an iso date not epoch.

That's the most r-slurred thing I've heard. "That's why sensible carpenters use a hammer not masking tape."

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There is no person DB.

Different parts of the SSA use different DB systems. Mostly it's based on transaction files with cobol based views on indexes of the transaction files.

MBR is the one that is used for receiving OA benefits and is a copy of lifetime SS taxes paid created when someone applies for OA. It's a 62 year old system.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Since you know so much about this, how's this fit with your 150 year max value?

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1739806134QgtyqCAuMAOzEQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There isn't a cobol epoch, it varies by system. It's like saying c++ has an epoch when it actually varies based on the system running the code, that's why sensible programmers use an iso date not epoch.

Gay. Either you use the unix epoch or you're wrong

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well, unless you built the system before UNIX existed

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No they too are wrong

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.