Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's difficult because Wiki has an army of rules-lawyering neurodivergents who work to force out new accounts. Touch anything related to politics and it'll be instantly reverted by a handful of people, and you'll be reported to the jannies on top of it.

If you have an established account, be subtle and link random 'sources'. They won't check the contents of the links, it just has to seem vaguely plausible and as long as it says what they want to hear you'll have no problems.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The level of bureaucracy on Wikipedia gatekeeps editing to all but the most neurodivergent.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reading any person or event that is slightly culture war is endless layers of bickering over sources, wiki dork terms and blatent bias everyone has to pretend is in good faith spanning over several years.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

VPNs and most proxies are no good, they will block your ip if it's not a residential proxy. That's how fricking anal they are, and this is my experience from a few years ago.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Forgot to give an example of subtle trolling: hotlink random mentions of 'bankers' to the 'Jews' page.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

frickkkkk this gave me so many ideas lmao love it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Back in the day I used to edit the articles for all the schools and colleges in my city (during class from a school ip) and fill them with hilarious random misinformation that remained up for many years after graduating.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Idk but I think @Sal seethemaxxxes on Wikipedia

@Sal discuss

:marseyschizosal:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.