https://youtube.com/watch?v=SPX1CieUkFY
I've been subbed to this sperg for a while but couldn't stomach his Ukraine vids, he turned into pizza incarnate once the war started. Now he even has another smug r-slur as a guest. It's funny how so called "skeptics" get mindbroken when something that isn't as obvious as "public transport good" comes around and they try tackling it, but now it's just too much, like he's being r-slurred on purpose to please his increasingly leftoid audience.
!commies can someone more resistant to cringe than me watch this and tl;dw it for me? I tried watching, then skipped around, and it looks kinda juicy but I just can't stand the smugness of these two.
Also what the frick is up with the map on the thumbnail, it looks very wrong
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Military streamer can't count and doesn't know what a tank is.
https://rdrama.net/h/slavshit/post/163813/wake-up-comrade-new-hohol-gigacope/4001630#context
(You)
(Me 
) 
(Streamer 
)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
unless im reading the chart incorrectly, he's saying in 2022 there were 2,420 T-72s, 580 T-80s, and 417 T-90s. 2420+580+417=3,417
in 2023 he's claiming that there were 996 T-72s, 462 T-80s, 54 T-90s, and 204 unknown tanks, which adds up to 1716
the 4,696 and 3,911 number come from 1:21 in the video, where he explained that some dude just bought a ton of satellite photos and counted it by hand
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Okay we'll do this very slowly because another ameritard had problems.
Oryx chart:
Random Internet R-slur who counted tanks and magically could determine which ones were in good condition:
It is amazing that he could calculate which tanks ran well from satellite imagery while also accounting for an extra 1300 which Oryx missed.
Sounds like a "tank" problem. Again, they don't know what a tank is, so why even pay attention to this nonsense?
As a bonus, the streamer looks at the 2022 and 2023 number and declares that that's how many tanks the Russians lost. (About 700). Meanwhile, the Oryx pic says around 2000 were lost. None of this is a red flag to you?
Surely, Americans are not this gullible and r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
if you can find a way to accurately count ever single tank thats been lost then be my guest, but for the time being we have estimations, which is what the numbers are presented as
maybe they do things different in europoor, but in america when you start off a number with a tilde, that means that its an estimation
i would trust Oryx more than some peepeehead who counted by hand, only because Oryx has pictures of the tanks that have been destroyed/abandoned/captured etc
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Absolutely gullible. I'm starting to see how intelligence agencies can be incompetent while also pulling off bullshit, lie about it, and get away with it. It's a shit estimate, so it gets thrown out---like in the real world with people who deal with data and statistics.
I'm not at odds with Oryx. It's the streamer's logic (700 tanks must be destroyed because cybertard can count "tanks"); it's his standard of evidence; and it's his inability to define and understand what he's talking about it. Within a minute, he's demonstrated that he's incompetent, so he shouldn't be taken seriously because he's a moron.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
idk if you misread my reply, but i explicitly said that i trust Oryx more than the guy who counted by hand
you know that oryx isn't the youtuber who counted the tanks right?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes. Then you mention estimates. Cybertard's estimates are also estimates, so I was running with that.
Main point: he's an r-slured streamer, and his information is down right bad. Dude thinks 700 tanks werre destroyed because he counted a difference b/w cybertard's estimates (that's not bad, unless of course Russia built more "tanks" during that time).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ok now we agree, i never said that i trust some peepeehead who counted tanks from satellite photos by hand, i dont know where you got that idea from
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context