https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Bakhmut
It's legit interesting how they destroyed any creditability Wikipedia had. There wasn't any khohol soldier in that city since May. Yes khohols saying that the city is encircled since April. But fact is Russian kicked out khohols from that city so battle is over khohol lost, there mb be battle of bakhmut 2 but battle of bakhmut 1 khohols lost. Anyone with 2 digit IQ understood it.
Those Wikipedia r-slurs made bakhmut battle be longer than battle of Verdun 
Give libs power and they start rewriting history
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Reminder the guy who created Wikipedia said it's shit lib propaganda
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
When you look at their page outlining what they consider "reputable/reliable sources" it becomes obvious why
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I thought they just switched sides for halftime
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Factcheck: This claim is currently being debunked.
This post was reviewed by an independent team of fact checkers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Artemosvk*
Bakhmut no longer exists
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Bakhmut:
archive.org
ghostarchive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context