https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/11/us/politics/us-ukraine-war-strategy.html
NYT counters with it was khohols that didn't used NATO strategy right.
So who are wrong ? Both sides the whole strategy was based that Russian would run when they see German tank. If foids are growing up on Disney shit then Russian boys on ww2 movies. That's common knowledge yet somehow western sociologist missed that point because they are r-slurs that destroyed the concept of sociology. So those tanks didn't lowered the Russian moral but increased it the conflict changed from brother war to Russia vs NATO.
So how does west plan to improve the situation ? They send a Jose Pedro Rodrigues nato general to Kiev to find a solution for this conflict 
and he will stay there for half a year 
But the answer is so simple for the west that conflict ain't that important as for Russia and west ain't ready to sacrifice as much as Russia is ready
What is this Jose Pedro Rodrigues general will tell that Mykola Pidarenko doesn't know ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Eastern European General staff grows up on Eastern European military doctrine, attempts to half-butt NATO doctrine which is fricking dumbed down to "shrug shoulders, wait for America to win the fricking day and establish air supremacy then advance and pretend we helped as well" grind down into WWI style antics. Shock from all sides.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They also now blame US for not giving them 16 f16. Like they legit think a f16A (1970) is going to be better than a mig 29 modernised by Israel in 2000 and that can use all shit f16 can.
Their pilots that spend 4 years studying in burgerstan flying inferior version of f16 than mig29 got bussy blasted on hits first flight
Edit: the mig 29 were modernised in 2014-2020
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context