.webp?h=8 "Merry Fistmas!")
Like from some magical reason on English page Ukraine is still fighting alone without support while even khohol page is more honest
Also funny how battle of bakhmut ended in German language
The Israel Wikipedia pages fights must be even fiercer but I don't know Arabic or Jewish
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Can you explain why Belarus is belligerent but NATO ain't ? Don't NATO countries let Ukraine use NATO countries similar how Russia using Belarus ? Or is NATO a friend in Russian eyes ?
Or better tell why English don't put NATO in belligerents and many other language do ?
I also remembered by nato standards giving tanks and jets is considered to be belligerent and that excuses they used to not give Ukraine those weapons
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ukrainian troops haven't crossed through NATO territory to attack Russia. For example if the Ukrainians attacked St. Petersburg from Finland then Finland would be a belligerent.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Also an extra if Germany repairing an tank that Russian damaged to send it back to fight Russian Germany is not belligerent when it does it for free and sanctioning Russia at same time ?
The only reason why Wikipedia doesn't state NATI as belligerent is the idea of not to provoke Putin and trying to continue selling to Russia that the west is not against Russian and Russian people so it's just a pure mental gymnastics
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes you are idiot
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you think about it logically, you'd realize you're wrong. Have you tried looking up the word "belligerent?"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I am not homosexual like you my friend
That what experts were telling the first month and since then Ukraine got close to 300 billions from NATO countries tons of weapons, offensive weapons (something on first days Biden told he won't give because it's escalations, but you of course forgot about it) then all those friendly sanctions towards Russian and cancelling Russia.
You tried to look up the word “idiot” ?
“Thinking about it logically”
What a joke you are
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Cite your source, sweaty, so I can read it.
From what you gave, they're arguing that they are a "belligerent" (according to some vague definition) because they gave "too much" in money and resources. If that's your standard, then the US and Soviet Union were in a Hot War, not a Cold War, because they were belligerents.
Ask yourself: when did the US join WW2 as a belligerent? It wasn't 1942 because they were giving the British weapons, even destroyers!, money, and material as early as 1939. Every reasonable historian will think that's an r-slured argument.
Why be an ideologue about this?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Also forgot mentioned US giving intelligence to Ukraine to attack Russian targets that alone should be enough for NATO to be participating country with hostile action against Russia so a belligerent
https://opiniojuris.org/2022/07/20/u-s-and-allied-involvement-in-the-russo-ukrainian-war-the-belligerent-status-of-nato-states-and-its-implications
I hate the hypocrisy how west tries to paint it self innocent and tells Putin is wrong and that NATO don't takes part in this conflict and that west never lies. When Russia told there are nato generals in Ukraine west was telling no it's false
Last year Russia told Poland has given Ukraine jets and Poland was saying no and this year it flex with this
Same with NATO generals
So when US training Ukrainian army, equipped it and planning the operation with its intelligence/officers inside Ukraine and targeting himars at Russians operating patriots. US is not a belligerent ?
Also if Russia views western action hostile and belligerent can west be not belligerent ? It's similar question is if you views someone as friend and he views you as enemy, are you friends ? Getting a enemy status is enough for one side to declare but a friend need booth side.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You subhuman mongoloids blew the shit out of Syria for years just like your ancestors. And now you're whining that somebody sent a broken item back to the manufacturer.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But that was based because Syrians deserved it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Wtf are you talking now about ? You told me I don't know what belligerent, I owned you hard and now you rambling some absolutely nonsense, how many times do I need to own you old man ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
US won't give Ukraine offensive weapons only defensive to not be belligerent you forgot those sentences? And now after giving over 100 billions and offensive weapons like tanks US is not belligerent it gives offensive weapons to hurt Russia is not hostile action right.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context