Like from some magical reason on English page Ukraine is still fighting alone without support while even khohol page is more honest
Also funny how battle of bakhmut ended in German language
The Israel Wikipedia pages fights must be even fiercer but I don't know Arabic or Jewish
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Now you are out of counter arguments and lost the discussion.
And we conclude NATO is belligerent but is just kitty butt to admit it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Your last post didn't address what I said. That's why I called it "rambling."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I gave you source and the source is law maker.
And I don't know much about UK part of ww2 to talk about it.
But reality is US is targeting Russian assets and then destroying them with US weapons that's a direct hostile action and there are special nato forces in Ukraine and generals
I made already a post in June when Russia killed tons of foreigners operators in khramatorsk.
If all what nato does against Russia is not belligerent then that word has no meaning
What Belarus did is let Russian use its territory and sell some weapons its a lot less what west did and west says Ukraine destroyed NS2 so how could Ukraine do this from its own territory ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wasn't that politician kitty walking similar how now west is gating like kitty telling its not part of it ?
Also thank you for not answering my question because you have no arguments
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The West was part of the Cold War....
I already repeated my argument. They're not belligerents in the commonly understood sense of that word.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There no war in Ukraine by common international sense
But last question
Should nato be included as “supported” here ?
And ain't funny you called Belarus belligerent when it's written “supposed”
So you were ok to mental gymnastics your way to say oh Belarus is belligerent but west ain't
See Germans are smarter
So again thanks showing me the western hypocrisy. You so smart that you were ok to rush ad Belarus as belligerent as it suits your agenda and then drop words as “logic”
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Looks like "parties to the conflict" or "participating Something" which seems different from "belligerent." You should really brush up on the basics.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wasn't me that mental doing gymnastics explaining why Belarus is belligerent and west ain't
In the end the tittle of the post is that English pages often unreliable.
The reason why nato is not included in supported is same as why bakhmut is still outgoing in English page.
First west told early it's not part of conflict other Zelenskyy didn't admitted losing bakhmut so pure western propoganda on site that call it self objective
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context