Like from some magical reason on English page Ukraine is still fighting alone without support while even khohol page is more honest
Also funny how battle of bakhmut ended in German language
The Israel Wikipedia pages fights must be even fiercer but I don't know Arabic or Jewish
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes you are idiot
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you think about it logically, you'd realize you're wrong. Have you tried looking up the word "belligerent?"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I am not homosexual like you my friend
That what experts were telling the first month and since then Ukraine got close to 300 billions from NATO countries tons of weapons, offensive weapons (something on first days Biden told he won't give because it's escalations, but you of course forgot about it) then all those friendly sanctions towards Russian and cancelling Russia.
You tried to look up the word “idiot” ?
“Thinking about it logically”
What a joke you are
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Cite your source, sweaty, so I can read it.
From what you gave, they're arguing that they are a "belligerent" (according to some vague definition) because they gave "too much" in money and resources. If that's your standard, then the US and Soviet Union were in a Hot War, not a Cold War, because they were belligerents.
Ask yourself: when did the US join WW2 as a belligerent? It wasn't 1942 because they were giving the British weapons, even destroyers!, money, and material as early as 1939. Every reasonable historian will think that's an r-slured argument.
Why be an ideologue about this?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Also forgot mentioned US giving intelligence to Ukraine to attack Russian targets that alone should be enough for NATO to be participating country with hostile action against Russia so a belligerent
https://opiniojuris.org/2022/07/20/u-s-and-allied-involvement-in-the-russo-ukrainian-war-the-belligerent-status-of-nato-states-and-its-implications
I hate the hypocrisy how west tries to paint it self innocent and tells Putin is wrong and that NATO don't takes part in this conflict and that west never lies. When Russia told there are nato generals in Ukraine west was telling no it's false
Last year Russia told Poland has given Ukraine jets and Poland was saying no and this year it flex with this
Same with NATO generals
So when US training Ukrainian army, equipped it and planning the operation with its intelligence/officers inside Ukraine and targeting himars at Russians operating patriots. US is not a belligerent ?
Also if Russia views western action hostile and belligerent can west be not belligerent ? It's similar question is if you views someone as friend and he views you as enemy, are you friends ? Getting a enemy status is enough for one side to declare but a friend need booth side.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Now you're just rambling.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Now you are out of counter arguments and lost the discussion.
And we conclude NATO is belligerent but is just kitty butt to admit it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Your last post didn't address what I said. That's why I called it "rambling."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context