Like from some magical reason on English page Ukraine is still fighting alone without support while even khohol page is more honest
Also funny how battle of bakhmut ended in German language
The Israel Wikipedia pages fights must be even fiercer but I don't know Arabic or Jewish
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The West was part of the Cold War....
I already repeated my argument. They're not belligerents in the commonly understood sense of that word.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There no war in Ukraine by common international sense
But last question
Should nato be included as “supported” here ?
And ain't funny you called Belarus belligerent when it's written “supposed”
So you were ok to mental gymnastics your way to say oh Belarus is belligerent but west ain't
See Germans are smarter
So again thanks showing me the western hypocrisy. You so smart that you were ok to rush ad Belarus as belligerent as it suits your agenda and then drop words as “logic”
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Looks like "parties to the conflict" or "participating Something" which seems different from "belligerent." You should really brush up on the basics.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wasn't me that mental doing gymnastics explaining why Belarus is belligerent and west ain't
In the end the tittle of the post is that English pages often unreliable.
The reason why nato is not included in supported is same as why bakhmut is still outgoing in English page.
First west told early it's not part of conflict other Zelenskyy didn't admitted losing bakhmut so pure western propoganda on site that call it self objective
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Great job, salvy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Excuse for not ending bakhmut fight was that “Russian didn't captured 200 meters of some woods outside bakhmut” Russian captured it and the fight is still outgoing because they found new excuses.
Is that my English fault ?
But why are they going out if their way to ad Belarus as supporter of Russia but don't ad any supporters to Ukraine, also my English fault ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't know about Belarus.
What kinda role did they play?
Oh, they let Russian troops in their country to attack another country.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If NATO let Ukies stage out of all the rest of Russia's borders…
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Are Ukrainian troops being allowed into Poland or the Baltic States to attack Belarus or Russia?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context