It's over for hohols- russia :marseyoctopusglow: adds another massive submarine to their might Black :marseydynamite: Sea fleet!!

https://x.com/DefenceU/status/1764936271439241421
26
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At this point Russians should use actual submarines. At least drones cannot hit those.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao ziggers really flex blowing up an abrams while their warships sinking

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Black Sea is to small for floats now with drones existence

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

On a serious :marseysnoomask: note, i wonder :marseysphinx: how much of this destruction :marseymar: is due to just the quality :marseygem: of the naval drones/skill of the ukrainian :marseyazov2: pilots or just general :marseydayan: unpreparadness by the russians

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In this case, it's a little patrol boat with only one gun.

It's essentially defenceless against a jet ski suicide drone

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not as well defended as a destroyer but calling a 1700 ton warship with vls cells and a 3" main gun "a little patrol boat" isn't accurate.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Modern western ships are fitted with remote 25mm weapons stations for this exact reason.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

According to wiki this class is equipped with (2) 14.5mm guns and (2) automatic grenade launchers of 45mm and 55mm caliber, and it carried a helicopter that would presumably be equipped with some atgm. That should be plenty of firepower against these drones. (Assuming the can hit them).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wonder if there remote weapon stations which are stabilized and have thermal imaging or is it some Russian guy shooting in the dark .

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyrussianmutt:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Russians depending on tech that doesn't actually work (because it's just cheap copies of last-gen NATO systems, or even consumer grade) is a lot of the reason these drone attacks are so effective.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The video of one boat shooting at a drone was using a manned turret.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So you can read the part of the Wikipedia entry that says "patrol boat"?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah and the new 13,000 ton ddgx in the works is a "destroyer." Point is this ship was on paper more than capable of defending itself.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Every Russian weapon system works on paper.

They lost their flagship to obsolete subsonic missiles that it absolutely should have shrugged off. What chance does this thing have?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseycope: right :marseyhesfluffyyouknow: sure, just a patrol boat

zigga theyve blown up a lot of shit im trying to ask deeper questions here

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseywingcuck:

Yeah, and you'd notice that sending a patrol boat with limited defences to go get itself blown up might point to a lack of preparedness.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They launching a lot of drones and almost daily. In this case no matter how prepared you will be still few will slide pass and it's seems one is enough to destroy a ship. Also it's bongs who are controlling those drones not Ukrainian.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no i meant it more in a technological sense, like in all of the footage :marseybigfoot: coming out of the successful attacks, it seems like the general :marseyjamesironwood: strategy of russian :marseyazov: ships in the black :marseytariq2: sea is to just try and shoot :marseygoodmap: the drones and sink them before :marseyskellington: they hit the ship, i feel like if russia :marseysunflower: had the resources :marseycatbert2: they would :marseymid: have done something more? because some pretty :marseyglam: important ships have been sunk/damaged, and russia :marseycomradehandshake: fricking :marseytom: loves its ships

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Russian loving their ship is one of few things I don't really get since Russian navy was.

More could been for sure done but some drones would still eventually slip. Drones are very cheap and easy to produce now so it will takes couple of years till decades to find a way to counter them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Big nets.really big nets will take care of drones

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Those drones are like Mexicans submarines they are mostly on top surface. They ain't underwater

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also air nets. Really big nets in the air

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

just put a cope cage on it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

America is handing drones fine in the Red Sea, it's a Russian problem.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah you are correct :surejan:

You are comparing few homemade drones with massive every day attacks of best nato drones. Somehow western tanks ain't performing that well against Russian drones and ironically Arab homemade drones still hits ships.

Being pro khohol is legit a diagnosis

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

2 weeks before things started

WAOW those ADVANCED IRANIAN DRONES and MISSILES are going to SINK THOSE FRICKING CARRIERS!!! GO TEAM GO GO GO!!!!!!!!!!! DEATH TO AMERIKKKA!!!!!!!!!

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096352564340057.webp

today

errr those drones were worthless, they are just homemade garbage... they never stood a chance xhohol

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096352565492713.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you ok pal ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you ok pal ?

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096742923458378.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You sound insane watch himars getting bussy blasted

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17096794429815552.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So what happened in Hrigorivka, Ivanovsk and Novomihalovka happened ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>We never needed the black sea

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The fantasy boi is back :surejan:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, now quickly post something about the abrams, leopards or the counteroffensive for the 564th time. :marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cutie twink what's wrong with you today ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cute twink with long hair calling others Twink. Seems we are :marseyprojection: a little bit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

darn I really bucked your mind

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Suicide torpedo boats used by Japs were essentially identical to modern "naval drones".

torpedo boats were literally invented in 19th century.

They were in fact first used in combat by russian Black Sea fleet itself against the :marseyturkroach: navy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.