While documentary films have a different purpose and approach compared too narrative fiction films, they share the same fundamental medium of cinema. They are produced, distributed, and exhibited through the same channels as traditional movies, and they are recognized and celebrated by the film industry as a legitimate form of cinematic expression. So, in essence, documentary films are considered a type of movie, albeit with a unique focus on documenting reality rather than telling a fictional story.
@cyberdick will never say @cyberdick love sucking peepee
It earned 22k buxx something new movie will easily beat and it has a very different goal and was even more a propaganda since it got 100% rating while they didn't even included to their list the Wagner movie “Best in Heck”
a movie that earned a lot more than the documentary. The maker of that documentary also wouldn't like to call their work a movie.
It also was part of bigger tv show as an episode of that show:
"20 Days in Mariupol"
Frontline episode
Episode no.
Season 2023
Episode 22
But best part is main producer is a burger foid journ*list that finished this:
“University of Wisconsin (B A., 1992) [1]
Columbia University Graduate School of Journ*lism (M.A.)”
is a 2023 Ukrainian documentary film directed by Mstyslav Chernov.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
r-slur
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20_Days_in_Mariupol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes you are an r-slur
Documentary films ain't considered movies
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
While documentary films have a different purpose and approach compared too narrative fiction films, they share the same fundamental medium of cinema. They are produced, distributed, and exhibited through the same channels as traditional movies, and they are recognized and celebrated by the film industry as a legitimate form of cinematic expression. So, in essence, documentary films are considered a type of movie, albeit with a unique focus on documenting reality rather than telling a fictional story.
@cyberdick will never say @cyberdick love sucking peepee
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It earned 22k buxx something new movie will easily beat and it has a very different goal and was even more a propaganda since it got 100% rating while they didn't even included to their list the Wagner movie “Best in Heck”
a movie that earned a lot more than the documentary. The maker of that documentary also wouldn't like to call their work a movie.
It also was part of bigger tv show as an episode of that show:
But best part is main producer is a burger foid journ*list that finished this:
“University of Wisconsin (B A., 1992) [1]
Columbia University Graduate School of Journ*lism (M.A.)”
So it was also produced as TV episode
So nothing points it's a movie
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Factcheck: This claim is both true and false.
This post was reviewed by an independent team of fact checkers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You're dumb, I'm not going to sit around milking you all day. You posted something unfunny, get over it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context