Reported by:

This is your average pro khohol

I just asked for proof of direct hit of the hospital and they doing unreal mental gymnastics like what's wrong with them ?

@IraniumDonGER seriously how did they even finished school if they can answer a simple question ? Or they didn't even finished it ? It's been now 5 days and no proofs and no open investigation.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17210446178794234.webp

Asking for proof of direct hit shows me a 3D model

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1721044618320477.webp

This is the hospital and if 5300lb directly hit it than there is pictures where that building is turned into dust

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17210449374483654.webp

He answered to this comment with 3D model. I didn't claimed it was Russian or Ukrainian missile I just asked for proof that 5300lb missile directly hit that hospital.

And they will claim they smart when they can straight answer a simple question

6
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>refuses to address issues with his proof

>refuses to point out any issues with evidence it's a KH-101

So it's a KH-101.

:#marseycope:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

refuses to address issues with his proofm

Why you so low IQ ?

I clearly stated edited videos are never a proof

Unverified: If video footage has unclear origins or either party cannot verify the video as authentic, then it may not be suitable as evidence. Manipulated: Editing a video may spark allegations of manipulation, and this footage may not be usable as evidence.

This is from law book and it's same no mater if it's common laws, civil laws, custom laws or mixed laws or the jurisdiction location

You don't understand basic laws, claims to have proofs yet don't understand how proofs work, then claims that I told things that I didn't.

You are legit low iq idiot

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

edited videos

Have you provided any evidence it's an edited video?

>switches to "unverified video"

>citing law rules

So you can't show its an edited video.

We ain't in a court, and it's the same video the still you're using to show it's an AMRAAM is from.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Have you provided any evidence it's an edited video?

All the videos posted online have some edits. I legit doubt og video with all the metadata's even exist. Because it's illegal in Ukraine to film airstrikes and AD work. So posting unedited video would be the last thing you'll want to do.

So you can't show its an edited video

It's you who need to prove it's legit video and you posted a clearly AI upscale picture and video with some artificial pixels behaviour on top of it you don't have the metadata's.

This is chronology of this case:

Ukraine suggest it's Russian kh101 missiles

Russia says no

Ukraine ask ICC for help

ICC ignores Ukraine

Ukrainecask NATO help

NATO doesn't help

Case close

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have to prove

No, I really don't. You are the one claiming that it is edited and the features of a KH-101 are fake. You have to prove that.

Every post is more :marseycope:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Every post is more :marseycope:

Yes every of your new post is just more cope and proof of your low IQ, you are the accuser and the rule says innocent until proven other wise like you homo know pretty well you have no metadata's or the original video and ask me to prove like how low IQ are you ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're the OP, you are making claims.

I write two or three sentences.

You write two or three paragraphs and fail to address any actual points brought up.

:#marseylongpost: :#marseycope: :#marseyseethe:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You write two or three paragraphs and fail to address any actual points brought up.

Point you are an idiot, how should I even address it ?

You're the OP, you are making claims.

That's legit not how things work, saying Russia is not guilty is defender point and at default state: presumption of innocence. You come with an edited video without meta date and even show ai upscaled picture and don't understand that those things ain't any evidence.

But my main post claim is ICC or other international organisations didn't opened any investigation about this hospital and the whole case was thrown into garbage. This automatically proves Russia is not guilty.

In all those days you just prove you don't understand how things work

You have 13000 coins, do you want to bet on them that ICC will open a case and prove its Russian missile ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#didntreadlol:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.