Unable to load image
/h/slavshit House Femboy Founder
rdramamademegay cock/balls :marseyevilgrin: i like this marsey its the best :marseyevilgrin:  2mo ago (edition.cnn.com) 347 thread views #298078

Ziggers caught :marseyflirt: on camera :marseyneat: executing surrendered Ukrainian :marseyazov2: soldiers :marseyarmy:

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/06/europe/video-russia-surrendering-ukrainian-soldiers-killed-intl-cmd/index.html

Death :marseykhorne: to ziggers

22
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

You just admitted one of them had an ak. We're now arguing over how many had an ak. Keep up.

I'm arguing that the last one was carrying something that COULD have been a weapon. The rest of them were clearly unarmed unless they were keeping their AKs in their butt.

Youre allowed to kill soldiers that aren't a threat to you. What do you think they do? Stand around and posture until they get grounds for self defense? Lmao you're an actual idiot.

You tell them to surrender, if they refuse you can determine that they are hostile. Honestly, I'm willing to concede that, even if he was court marshaled, he could have simply said that he was too disoriented by the battle to determine whether or not he was hostile, so he probably wouldn't be sentenced.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally everyone surrendered and was lying on the ground except one guy who decided to open fire.

Has now been retracted to

I'm arguing that the last one was carrying something that COULD have been a weapon.

Vatnik you can do better.

you tell them to surrender. If they refuse then you can determine they're hostile

Uh no. They're not cops. The uniform the person is wearing declares him as hostile. It is why soldiers are required to wear them during war.

if he was court marshalled

Nothing be did would lead to a court Marshall. He shot an enemy combatant that was stunned by an explosive. Vatniks resisting to trust mobiks with rifles doesn't mean you're not allowed to shoot them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I was giving hohols the benefit of the doubt because it did seem like he was carrying something, however, upon further inspection, I'm not sure if that something was a weapon. Even if it was, the other soldiers were clearly unarmed and lying on the ground, which makes their surrender perfectly real.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

By the way in your tell them to surrender first mind how do ambushes work? You get all set up to attack their convoy then send a runner over to gauge intent?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you are ambushing someone, they would clearly be armed and combat-ready, so you are attacking a hostile force.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's not a requirement. You can ambush unarmed enemy soldiers who believe they are completely safe.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Fair enough, I will retract that point. The first one still stands. As well as the two I linked later. The one without a video I will also concede to be anecdotal evidence.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.