Unable to load image
/h/slavshit House Femboy Founder
rdramamademegay cock/balls :marseyevilgrin: i like this marsey its the best :marseyevilgrin:  2mo ago (edition.cnn.com) 347 thread views #298078

Ziggers caught :marseyflirt: on camera :marseyneat: executing surrendered Ukrainian :marseyazov2: soldiers :marseyarmy:

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/06/europe/video-russia-surrendering-ukrainian-soldiers-killed-intl-cmd/index.html

Death :marseykhorne: to ziggers

22
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

Second video just shows the aftermath of a false surrender.

Literally everyone surrendered and was lying on the ground except one guy who decided to open fire.

First video shows a guy hiding in a bunker getting shot

An unarmed guy lying on the ground barely conscious.

Third is just a third hand account probably made up with no video.

"NOOOOO HOHOLS GOOD! I WANT HOHOL PEEPEE"

Here are two more:

https://www.bbc.com/news/60907259

https://www.businessinsider.com/video-appears-to-show-ukrainian-soldiers-executing-captured-russian-soldier-nyt-2022-4

Now will you stop sucking Ukrop peepee for five minutes? It's not that Putin isn't a godawful president who surrounds himself with godawful people who form the Russian government, it's that all this "Vatniks bad, Ukraine good boy who dindu nuffin" is really annoying.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally everyone surrendered and was lying on the ground except one guy who decided to open fire

You just admitted the vatniks committed a war crime. That's perfidy. Too bad it got his friends killed.

unarmed guy

Still a lawful combatant in uniform that was upright in a fighting position not surrendering. Maybe he should have surrendered before nades went off by him.

here are some more links

No I'm not watching more of your bullshit. Even in your own videos vatniks are committing war crimes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You just admitted the vatniks committed a war crime. That's perfidy. Too bad it got his friends killed.

No, I just admitted that one guy committed a war crime and they decided to slaughter actual prisoners of war because of it.

Still a lawful combatant in uniform that was upright in a fighting position not surrendering. Maybe he should have surrendered before nades went off by him.

He was obviously disoriented by a bomb and didn't realize what was happening. He was unarmed and didn't express any desire to attack, so this is just your pathetic attempt to suck hohol peepee.

No I'm not watching more of your bullshit. Even in your own videos vatniks are committing war crimes

:marseysoycrytalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

just one guy committed a war crime

Lmao Holy shit.

Then they just killed everyone

You already admitted at least one of this group was committing a false surrender. I'm going to assume all of them were doing it.

but he was disoriented

Yeah that's the whole point of nading when you're clearing enclosed spaces. Nothing you described makes him anything but a valid target.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You already admitted at least one of this group was committing a false surrender. I'm going to assume all of them were doing it.

By lying on the ground with their hands above their heads? That one guy probably decided not to listen to his commander and kill as many as he could before dying.

Yeah that's the whole point of nading when you're clearing enclosed spaces. Nothing you described makes him anything but a valid target.

Being unarmed and not expressing any hostility makes him an invalid target.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they were just lying on the ground

Hiding grenades and aks

unarmed and not being hostile makes him an invalid target

That's completely untrue. He's an enemy combatant in uniform and is a valid target. You could bomb his barracks while he's sleeping cuddling his chechnyan r*pe buddy and it isn't a war crime.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hiding grenades and aks

Where the frick do you see any AKs? They are completely unarmed. Even if they weren't, there's no way that they could pull any sort of weapon and use it against an enemy before getting shot in this situation. If that was their plan, they could have just not surrendered and fought till the last man. Keep in mind, I'm not even sure if that last guy at the end was actually carrying a weapon or if they just shot him because they thought he was carrying the weapon. I THINK that he had something in his arms.

That's completely untrue. He's an enemy combatant in uniform and is a valid target. You could bomb his barracks while he's sleeping cuddling his chechnyan r*pe buddy and it isn't a war crime.

Bombing the enemy position and killing an enemy that you can obviously see isn't a threat to you are two completely different things.

Anyway, the last two links I gave you are far less disputed, so go watch them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they are unarmed

You just admitted one of them had an ak. We're now arguing over how many had an ak. Keep up.

killing an enemy that isn't a threat to you

Youre allowed to kill soldiers that aren't a threat to you. What do you think they do? Stand around and posture until they get grounds for self defense? Lmao you're an actual idiot.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You just admitted one of them had an ak. We're now arguing over how many had an ak. Keep up.

I'm arguing that the last one was carrying something that COULD have been a weapon. The rest of them were clearly unarmed unless they were keeping their AKs in their butt.

Youre allowed to kill soldiers that aren't a threat to you. What do you think they do? Stand around and posture until they get grounds for self defense? Lmao you're an actual idiot.

You tell them to surrender, if they refuse you can determine that they are hostile. Honestly, I'm willing to concede that, even if he was court marshaled, he could have simply said that he was too disoriented by the battle to determine whether or not he was hostile, so he probably wouldn't be sentenced.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

How do you internalize cope that's so r-slurred? I couldn't do it, maybe I'm not a FAS without a father

Can you tell the difference? Or is r-slurred all you are?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#soysnooseethetalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.