https://grahamhancock.com/natawidjajadh1/
As far as I can tell his evidence basically boils down to:
It looks like a pyramid to me.
Radiocarbon dating of the soil in it comes back with a result of 25,000 years.
The normies respond with:
It looks like a hill to me.
There's zero evidence that the soil is related to any human activity.
That's not even how radiocarbon dating works. The soil samples have carbon-14 deposited by the roots of countless plants over millenia.
Why does the global normie conspiracy always oppress scholars who think outside the box?
Links 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The onus is on him to prove his wild claim(s).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context