By due I mean its almost certainly already out there.
There have been 5 generation of jets since the 1940s. That is an average of one jet generation every 16.8 years.
5th Generation began in 2005. It's been 19.5 years now.
What to expect in a 6th generation aircraft:
Honestly, I think its going to be an everything jet. In the sense that it would be able to do everything any specialized jet in the 5th gen could do, along with having more automation and a possible no pilot mode where they can be flown without a pilot from another location or giving full autonomy to built in sensors.
In terms of elevation the jet will likely be limited to 50,000 ft just like the previous 2-3 generations of jets. Although I am hoping for an upgrade to 60,000 ft so that there is a feeling of scaling up.
It should also be faster than the current generation of jets, which is generally going at 1.6 Mach speed. That is around 1,200 miles per hour.
Hopefully this next generation we get something that can move at speeds of 1,500+ miles per hour.
The primary issue is that the human body can only handle so many Gs of gravitational force on the body and the faster a jet is moving the more Gs of force the human body is getting hit by.
The most convenient solution is to remove the pilot altogether and move on to autonomous jets or jets piloted outside the plane itself for 6th generation aircraft.
Conclusion:
There is a hardline limit on passenger craft speeds due to how many Gs of force the human body can comfortably handle.
It's not a tech issue, it's a biology issue.
Only a spaceship would at this point be able to provide faster travel for passengers in the aviation industry, as a spaceship leaves the atmosphere and lowers the amounts of Gs of force suffered by the passengers.
Robots will fight future wars at the limits of human biology combined with technology are reached.
The only way to make better soldiers now is to biologically enhance them.
We will see active biological enhancement of soldiers in the next generation followed by replacement with robots over the course of this century.
Links 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Isn't this more of less what the F-35 was compared to the previous generation though? It was a speed downgrade from the F-22 ofc but then again speed isn't the only important feature, and we still have F-22's when we need a true air superiority fighter, but we really don't need THAT many of those, the whole point is that they can shoot down many enemy aircraft without suffering a loss.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, so next gen should be an upgrade over f35 combined with an upgrade over the f-22 in capability along with whatever it brings to the table on its own.
Having one replacement for both the f22 and the f35 is cheaper than keeping both of them around ain't it?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Depends. A knife and a pair of scissors is probably always gonna be cheaper than a Swiss army knife
2 in one doesn't mean half the price.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
True. But I bet the swiss army knife is cheaper than all of its components bought individually?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Sure but there's real tradeoffs to be made. That's why we decided rather than try to make the f35 better than the f22 in all aspects we'd just keep some f22s around.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah but the only way you could make something better than the f35 is to make a new jet that has the capabilities of both the f35 and the f22 because you cannot make the jet faster with a human pilot inside.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
F-22 is finna retire but at least it did get one air to air kill (a balloon) finally
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context