"When the Barbican theatre in London decided that the solution to the long queues for female pottys at the performance interval was to make all the pottys gender neutral. Except women didn't want to use the 'gender neutral pottys with urinals', while men were happy to use the 'gender neutral pottys without urinals' - thereby effectively increasing potty provision for men while doing almost nothing to improve potty provision for women."

https://old.reddit.com/r/AskUK/comments/1az389l/what_do_you_think_about_not_being_allowed_back/krze77j/?context=8#thing_t1_krze77j

https://medium.com/@sepideghate/gender-bias-in-public-bathroom-designs-c72d2a38660c

Found this post on reddit and somehow everyone involved has just missed the problem is women being :marseyfoidretard:

Block /h/toomanyxchromosomes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

asshole there/then :marseydunce:

10mo ago #6007535 🌈🌈⭐️ Broke Even

First of all, if you divide the floor space 50/50 for men and women, it means that the number of people who can relieve themselves concurrently is a lot higher in male bathrooms as male bathrooms are divided into urinals which take up lesser space and cubicles whereas female pottys can only have cubicles. But even if there are equal number of stalls in male and female bathrooms, the issue wouldn't be resolved as on average women take 2.3 times loner than men to use the potty.

why did men do this?

!slots100