The wokes haves spammed the r/Grimdank subreddit with Female Custodes "Memes" for the past 3 days, so that even the comparatively moderate liberal mods plan to ban the subject by next week.

Eight points I'd like addressed. Most important is 3.

What would constitute a post that falls under the FSM rule in this case? Is it as stated here and in the FSM post, all references to FSM period?

Does it include only those posts that directly bemoan the existence of femstodes, which are largely the issue now, as well as posts that "complain about the complaining?"

Does it include posts that include Custodes that happen to be female, but the subject of which is not their gender? Because people like /u/Insan1ty have proven capable of actually contributing without feeding into drama, and if people want to complain under a post that has nothing to do with the controversy other than having a Custodes that happens to be female then they alone are responsible.

What about memes about Custodes's sexual ambiguity on account of their androgynous armor? Those are at least mildly entertaining as opposed to being simply ragebait.

There's something to be said about posts that don't directly mention Femstodes but are talking about politics adjacent to that topic, but I guess those are covered by Rule 6 or even sometimes Rules 2 and 7 anyway.

I'll assume muscle mommy memes fall under this. I don't have a problem with it, but I'll admit it absolutely falls under the "dead horse" case and it's very much just people like me airing out their fetish. Unless it's Vezimira, Vezimira should always be allowed.

What about Golden Girls?

Tying back into point 3. What about our girl Calladyce Taurovalia fricking Kesh? I understand we only have two pages of her now so memes won't exactly be varied, but I think she's emblematic about the contributions Femstodes memes can make outside of simple "OOOO WOMAN! I HATE WOMEN! I LIKE WOMEN!"

How to say I'm an neurodivergent in 8 parts