This is why you shouldn't put transgenders in the wrong bathroom

You misunderstand the crux of my argument. I draw upon Augustine's wisdom to elucidate the fallacy in your reasoning. Just as God did not create evil because evil is the absence of good, the LACK of """non-gayness""" cannot be considered a thing. Did you perhaps mean "straight"? You literally make no sense. Your feeble attempt to twist philosophical musings into a justification for your inanity is laughable, at best.

>The post wouldn't exist if a cis woman wrote it because the premise of the post is contingent on that not being the case.

This is true, but adds literally nothing to your position; it does not support your argument and in fact hints towards the incoherence of it. My assertion here is that, for some reason, perhaps one contrived solely for this thought experiment, if a cis woman were required to use the men's restroom, and wrote a post like this as a response, your response wouldn't be "thats gay". Your inability to imagine such a scenario prays tell to your lack of creativity and dynamic thinking; you do not truly understand the world, or care to think about it critically, and hence lack the ability to reason about what would happen in unusual scenarios. In the realm of thought, as you so fondly put it, your rickety arguments crumble under the weight of true intellectual scrutiny. Augustine would undoubtedly frown upon the idiotic nature of your responses.