emoji-award-marseyitsoverwereback
emoji-award-marseyravecope
Unable to load image
Reported by:
  • X : The report supports a **research study** being implemented

Cass walks back many Cass report conclusions in new Q&A, states she supports pathway for pre-pubertal children to have access to puberty blockers

https://thekitetrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Cass-Review-Mythbusting-Q-and-A.pdf

Bruh :marseyfacepalm:

>The Cass Review Report does not conclude that puberty suppressing hormones are an unsafe treatment.

>The report supports a research study being implemented to allow pre-pubertal children to have a pathway to accessing this treatment in a timely way and with suitable follow up and data collection, to provide the highest quality of evidence for the ongoing use of puberty suppressing hormones as a treatment for gender dysphoria.

>In the data Cass Review Examined, the most common age that trans young people were being initially prescribed puberty suppressing hormones was 15. Dr. Cass's view is that this is too late to have the intended benefits of suppressing puberty...recommends that...puberty suppressing hormones and gender affirming hormones being available to young people at different ages and developmental stages...based on individual need.

>Dr. Cass has stated that there should be zero tolerance for conversion practices and it should be a matter for a regulator to investigate if anyone is found to be causing harm in this way.

>Dr. Cass is keen for legislators to enact a ban on conversion practices, and that this ban should come with enough support for NHS staff to understand the difference between conversion practice and supporting young people who are not yet fully certain about their gender identity

https://thekitetrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Cass-Review-Mythbusting-Q-and-A.pdf

36
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • X : lmao fricking males

The Kite Trust

Hmm. No Wikipedia but top person comes up:

"Sarah Brown"

Photo is right after the full transition and starting a career that appears to have gone nowhere politically after 2013, so maybe they head this up.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17135540129750197.webp - 13 May 2010

Sarah Brown is a transgender activist and former Liberal Democrat politician. She was the Cambridge City Councillor for Petersfield ward between 2010 and 2014, serving as Executive Councillor for Community Wellbeing since 2013[5] and served as a member of the LGBT+ Liberal Democrats executive. She is a trans woman and, for several years, was the only openly transgender elected politician in the UK.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Brown_(politician)

https://thekitetrust.org.uk/about-us/

Ok this place is where Sarah Brown was from.

LOL they're in a threesome that pre dates the original wife before Sarah Brown transitioned:

‘Why three in a bed isn't a crowd' - the polyamorous trio -UK Guardian

When Sylvia's husband said he wanted to become a woman, she stayed with him. But then Zoe, formerly a married man, joined the relationship

Sat 20 Apr 2013

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/apr/20/greatest-sexual-taboo-polyamorous-transgender

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17135540132011209.webp - Zoe O'Connell, left, Sarah Brown, centre, and Sylvia Knight, who live together in a polyamorous relationship.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>https://i.rdrama.net/images/17135540129750197.webp -

https://media.giphy.com/media/JmBXdjfIblJDi/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

transgender activist and former Liberal Democrat politician.

Oh I've seen this one before!

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17135608086764452.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wonder where they are holding her family.

:marseytrain!2: :marsey#zoomer:


:#marseydisintegrate: :!#marseyflamewar::space::!marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • X : :transtantrum: puberty blockers are still generally banned :marseyrave:
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Transphobes when the science proves them wrong time and time again. :marseywholesometrans:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Good, this is the only reasonable opinion. After all we desperately need human test subjects and a proper medical trial would take too long and it would definitely be considered unethical, easier to just rope imbeciles into willingly testing all the new fancy synthetic hormones :marseycapitalistmanlet:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Consider the comparative marginal cost of not making these available

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

what cost?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Like with AI free testing data is more important now than artificially keeping prices up. Things might change later on :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This isn't walking anything back, do you even read what you post? Go back to Green Eggs and Ham, you remedial :marseylifeloser:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17135584986234937.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

r u r-slurred Cass walked literally nothing back this Q and A just debunks the myths :marseytrain2:s made up about the review :marseyfacepalm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It would be a hate crime to prevent someone from receiving life-saving medical care :marseybow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Get rekt transphobes and choke on the gock

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#chudturbospergout2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The report states that puberty blockers should only be offered under a research protocol and is open the possibility that it could help neofoids. The report expresses skepticism that they reduce suicidality, expresses a belief that they could cause bone density issues, and that they don't buy time to think because nearly every kid that gets put on them ends up on HRT so they may disrupt the transition process rather than helping. The report never called to ban puberty blockers.

Note that transgender male refers to pooners and transgender female refers to hons

Source

Parents and families need support and advice about how best to support their children in a balanced and non-judgemental way. In reviewing cases put forward for puberty blockers, the MPRG noted that children who had socially transitioned early and completely were likely to approach puberty in a fearful and anxious state because of living ‘in stealth'. Helping parents and families to ensure that options remain open and flexible for the child, whilst ensuring that the child is able to function well in school and socially is an important aspect of care provision and there should be no lower age limit for accessing such help and support. Importantly some children within this group who remain gender incongruent into puberty may benefit from puberty blockers and will be able to enter the specialist component of the service and access the puberty blocker trial in a timely way, if already under the supervision of the regional network.

From page 223

14.56 Transgender males masculinise well on testosterone, so there is no obvious benefit of puberty blockers in helping them to ‘pass' in later life, particularly if the use of puberty blockers does not lead to an increase in adult height.

14.58 In summary, there seems to be a very narrow indication for the use of puberty blockers in birth-registered males as the start of a medical transition pathway in order to stop irreversible pubertal changes. Other indications remain unproven at this time.

From page 180

83. Moreover, given that the vast majority of young people started on puberty blockers proceed from puberty blockers to masculinising/feminising hormones, there is no evidence that puberty blockers buy time to think, and some concern that they may change the trajectory of psychosexual and gender identity development.

84. The Review's letter to NHS England (July 2023) advised that because puberty blockers only have clearly defined benefits in quite narrow circumstances, and because of the potential risks to neurocognitive development, psychosexual development and longer-term bone health, they should only be offered under a research protocol. This has been taken forward by NHS England and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).

From page 32

If this is the case, brain maturation may be temporarily or permanently disrupted by puberty blockers, which could have significant impact on the ability to make complex risk-laden decisions, as well as possible longer-term neuropsychological consequences. To date, there has been very limited research on the short-, medium- or longer-term impact of puberty blockers on neurocognitive development. In light of these critically important unanswered questions, I would suggest that consideration is given to the rapid establishment of the necessary research infrastructure to prospectively enrol young people being considered for hormone treatment into a formal research programme with adequate follow up into adulthood, with a more immediate focus on the questions regarding puberty blockers. The appropriate research questions and protocols will need to be developed with input from a panel of academics, clinicians, service users and ethicists.

From page 322 from a letter from Cass

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is a really long way of saying you don't frick.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I tran I know has "long covid". Valid?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

name one thing it walked back you r-slurred click farmer

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I knew you would accuse me of projecting because thats all you can do. But my post history and your post history are both easily accessible, pathetic worm. Everyone who cares to look can see youre a porn obsessed, extremely online, spiteful little incel. You think you are unique for pooping on :!marseytrain:s or me on this website? Far from it. But few have the stink of failure that emanates from your posts. Even though @X is online all day too, at least she(?) will put together coherent posts to try to prove a point, show moments of human warmth to others, and so on. You stand alone in not only being extremely online and hateful to cope, but also in being thoughtless, insecure of yourself, and devoid of any higher political ideals. The lowest of the low. You will congratulate yourself because i wrote a sincere long post (something you are incapable of), but at the end of the day you have to live with your pitiful self and i will remind you every time i see you that you will never have s*x or purpose in this life unless you change your ways. See you soon!

Snapshots:

https://thekitetrust.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Cass-Review-Mythbusting-Q-and-A.pdf:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.