Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He rejects as non-fundamental any mathematics that involves infinite sets or infinite processes

Finitist nonsense

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

based

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Show me a real number. :#marseytrumpss:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The length of a diagonal of a unit square.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyscoot:

Calculus is a lie. Wake up. Embrace :marseyhugpeepeehands: algebra and its perfectoidness.

Kill infinitecels. Embrace :marseyhugmaximus: time cube.

https://www.timecube.space/

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reading the explanation it's not even finitist. He has no problem with saying that there's an infinite number of natural numbers. But somehow the epsilon-delta formalism used to define equivalence classes on converging sequences, goes too far, despite also never touching the actual infinity and being fundamentally no different from running induction on natural numbers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cauchy too was a verbose :marseybritbongitsover: babbling cute twink.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.