https://old.reddit.com/r/pcgaming/comments/1agc0sp/obsidian_explains_why_avowed_only_lets_you_pick
Top Poster of the Day:
hohomothyX2
Current Registered Users: 28,758
the gaymen hole 😳😳😳
Post content related to video games, video game fandoms, culture, etc.
Touhou is video games not anime.
Check out /h/kappa
/h/vidya SETTINGS /h/vidya LOG /h/vidya MODS /h/vidya EXILEES /h/vidya FOLLOWERS /h/vidya BLOCKERS
Current software version: 988f469
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That was my point. His world building is shit, so he has to use an IP created by other people
So he cannot create worlds (PS:T) nor can he write single characters (pillars 1). Not much left. Over arching stories or "idea" guys are not unique.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Or maybe TSR wanted Interplay to use their existing D&D setting to drive up book sales, not invent their own. I bet you're not even arguing in good faith.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's a good point with TSR. It's almost true and I give you that point. "Chris Avellone: Boring answer, but here it is: Interplay had the license [ ...] The setting and engine was dictated to us" src (small sidenote: TSR was bought by wotc in 97, game was released in 99, so tsr was on its deathbed and didn't have any say in anything).
I definitely argue in good faith that Chris Avellone is overhyped.
Since you love PS:T so much, what about Tides of Numenera? Why is Avellone's work in Cook's universe not praised as much as Avellone's work in Planescape?
edit:
that rpgwatch article is a really good source. It links to Ravel_First_Draft.doc written by Avellone which has 19 pages. The Ravel_Final.doc has 124pages and Avellone states in the interview that it was written by others. Not saying he isn't a good lead designer/writer, but most of his accolades is coming off the work of others.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context