/h/vidya
ticktocktrainbuteepy
lol/lmao/even
HELLO? IS THIS THING ON?
2mo ago
(image post)
2,037 thread views
#298623
You're not playing any of these games, right, anon?
- 246
- 126
Top Poster of the Day:
peepeehands
Current Registered Users: 28,684
the gaymen hole 😳😳😳
Post content related to video games, video game fandoms, culture, etc.
Touhou is video games not anime.
/h/vidya SETTINGS /h/vidya LOG /h/vidya MODS /h/vidya EXILEES /h/vidya FOLLOWERS /h/vidya BLOCKERS
Current software version: d7759c7
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Did you?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, I sent them to you, and all of a sudden, they don't exist. Centuries of the classics are wrong- Internet people who for political reasons need to deny homosexual practices existed before the 20th century are right! Even people who lived in times which heavily disapproved of homosexuality, are lying when they say otherwise about the Sacred Band in their studies! Lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You are just posting random shit you found that isnt even close to sourced lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There is still time to admit you didn't read even a single sentence of my post. I quoted six classical authors.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's still time to admit you've even given and thought to the fact that this shit might be made up and just blindly googled a shitty defense of it to cling to your sad world view
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
OK, so you just admitted you didn't read my post, or you're trolling. I hope for the latter.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You post the same shitty sources that wikipedia uses to promote the idea that they were all gay. True scholar you are. The best thing any actual scholar will tell you about that shit is "maybe". Do something other than google this shit for sources that agree with you if you are at all interested in finding the truth.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There are only so many classical texts still extant, what do you want me to do, make up new sources? Of course Wikipedia would cite some of these. "Shitty"? No, these are direct quotations from classical texts (in translation of course). What kind of point is that?
You listened to some Internet contrarian who claims that the existence of homosexual practices in ancient Greece was made up by a gay dude in the 70s...... and had zero knowledge of the classical sources involving this topic. This conversation started with the lie that this was something made up by some gay dude in the 70s.
And you've listened to a """scholar""" on the Internet which defamed the entire field of classics because of his wingcuckery. Someone who is willing to make up the most ridiculous lies.
If you are at all interested in finding the truth, perhaps do not listen to these people. They certainly do not care about truth.
EDIT: it is interesting that Miffin says I "googled this shit[sic] for sources that agree with" me. I made quotations from the extant classical corpus on the Sacred Band. I am sure the irony here is not lost.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And you've done less than that lmao. Your "classical texts", none of which you have actually read btw, are all either taken out of context snippets written by enemies of thebes or long after the fact speculations based on those snippets. And of those you are posting modern translations that do things like take words that mean very well could be translated as friends and translate that shit to lovers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context