ticktocktrainbuteepylol/lmao/even
HELLO? IS THIS THING ON? AM I ALL ALONE? IS ANYONE THERE? I NEED A BIGGER GUN
2mo ago(image post)2,038 thread views#298623
You arent even quoting classical texts. You are quoting someones interpretation of them. Those are all modern interpretations of classic texts. You have no idea what you are talking about and only proving my point.
GigaNew2024Accountqu/acc
I upmarsey posts "I downmarsey bad posts" downmarseyd; UNBLOCK ME HAILVICTORY1776
Miffin 2mo ago#6990269
Edited 2mo ago
spent 0 currency on pings
What interpretation? How are they modern, do you know the citations? Did you even read anything?
EDIT: Miffin will continue to deny that I directly quoted classical texts for the rest of the exchange, presumably because Miffin didn't read the comment. I can't tell if it's a troll, or some kind of bluff (in which case this was all a projection? talk about the Internet being srs bzns... well, Miffin says later it's from a college class, so I assume it's well-meaning, but authority can be a piece of work)? In any case...
GigaNew2024Accountqu/acc
I upmarsey posts "I downmarsey bad posts" downmarseyd; UNBLOCK ME HAILVICTORY1776
Miffin 2mo ago#6990276
spent 0 currency on pings
Yes, I sent them to you, and all of a sudden, they don't exist. Centuries of the classics are wrong- Internet people who for political reasons need to deny homosexual practices existed before the 20th century are right! Even people who lived in times which heavily disapproved of homosexuality, are lying when they say otherwise about the Sacred Band in their studies! Lol
GigaNew2024Accountqu/acc
I upmarsey posts "I downmarsey bad posts" downmarseyd; UNBLOCK ME HAILVICTORY1776
Miffin 2mo ago#6990282
spent 0 currency on pings
There is still time to admit you didn't read even a single sentence of my post. I quoted six classical authors.
There's still time to admit you've even given and thought to the fact that this shit might be made up and just blindly googled a shitty defense of it to cling to your sad world view
GigaNew2024Accountqu/acc
I upmarsey posts "I downmarsey bad posts" downmarseyd; UNBLOCK ME HAILVICTORY1776
Miffin 2mo ago#6990286
spent 0 currency on pings
OK, so you just admitted you didn't read my post, or you're trolling. I hope for the latter.
You post the same shitty sources that wikipedia uses to promote the idea that they were all gay. True scholar you are. The best thing any actual scholar will tell you about that shit is "maybe". Do something other than google this shit for sources that agree with you if you are at all interested in finding the truth.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You arent even quoting classical texts. You are quoting someones interpretation of them. Those are all modern interpretations of classic texts. You have no idea what you are talking about and only proving my point.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What interpretation? How are they modern, do you know the citations? Did you even read anything?
EDIT: Miffin will continue to deny that I directly quoted classical texts for the rest of the exchange, presumably because Miffin didn't read the comment. I can't tell if it's a troll, or some kind of bluff (in which case this was all a projection? talk about the Internet being srs bzns... well, Miffin says later it's from a college class, so I assume it's well-meaning, but authority can be a piece of work)? In any case...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Did you?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, I sent them to you, and all of a sudden, they don't exist. Centuries of the classics are wrong- Internet people who for political reasons need to deny homosexual practices existed before the 20th century are right! Even people who lived in times which heavily disapproved of homosexuality, are lying when they say otherwise about the Sacred Band in their studies! Lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You are just posting random shit you found that isnt even close to sourced lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There is still time to admit you didn't read even a single sentence of my post. I quoted six classical authors.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's still time to admit you've even given and thought to the fact that this shit might be made up and just blindly googled a shitty defense of it to cling to your sad world view
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
OK, so you just admitted you didn't read my post, or you're trolling. I hope for the latter.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You post the same shitty sources that wikipedia uses to promote the idea that they were all gay. True scholar you are. The best thing any actual scholar will tell you about that shit is "maybe". Do something other than google this shit for sources that agree with you if you are at all interested in finding the truth.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context