You're not playing any of these games, right, anon?

>you made that up on the spot

No, you just googled answers to counter it by sham historians. I'm gonna go. You are just going to keep crying about how all your flawed sources from wikipedia are correct so there's not really a point in trying to argue

Here's a quote for you

>The legend of the Sacred Band seems to have begun in the early fourth century as a fanciful real-world analogy that initially supported and ultimately replaced a utopian proposal to build a city or army on the ennobling bond between lover and beloved. The citizens of this ideal polis would be unified and conspicuous in their love of liberty, and it was perhaps this idea that gave the Theban Sacred Band a history. For although an actual Sacred Band—if there even was one—must have fought many battles from 375 to 338, the tradition of the Sacred Band focused on just three battles in which the man-loving Thebans fought tyrants on Boeotian soil: Tegyra and Leuctra, where the Thebans toppled the Spartan hegemony and restored freedom to Boeotia and Greece, and Chaeronea, where they fell bravely to the tyrannical Philip, who brought Greek liberty to an end. Tegyra and Leuctra had probably already been fashioned into stands against tyranny in Callisthenes' Hellenica, and possibly already in the obscure Boeotian chroniclers on whom Callisthenes is supposed to have drawn, and Chaeronea, Thebes's answer to the heroic stand of Leonidas and the three hundred Spartans at Thermopylae, may have come to be understood in similar terms. But it was not until this panegyric history became attached to the erotic political philosophy of men like Plato, Xenophon's Pausanias, and Zeno of Citium that the legend of the Sacred Band acquired its distinctive erotic dimension.