You're not playing any of these games, right, anon?

No, you just googled answers to counter it by sham historians. I'm gonna go. You are just going to keep crying about how all your flawed sources from wikipedia are correct so there's not really a point in trying to argue

Et voila: quotations from classical sources are sham historians from Wikipedia! But wingcuck liars on the Internet are REAL historians!

I do not see anything in that quote saying that homosexual practices in ancient Greece were made up by a gay dude in the 1970s. Interesting.

EDIT: Miffin quotes here Leitao's "The Legend of the Sacred Band". I am obviously well aware of this, as I have previously mentioned that revisionary historians on this topic exist. However, if you care about consensus, they are still, well, revisionaries/the minority, and two, as is plain to all to see, Leitao doesn't deny the multiple accounts which I have procured... because, they are direct citations from classical texts, and not 'agreed points by sham historians I googled for this shit[sic]' or whaever. I am sure that the irony is palpable- the only person who has quoted secondary source shit[sic] that only agrees with one's points is Miffin. I have exclusively quoted primary sources.