https://old.reddit.com/r/Wallstreetsilver/comments/z1frav/us_fda_now_says_that_their_campaign_to_stop
- 58
- 66
Top Poster of the Day:
911roofer
Current Registered Users: 27,772
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS SITE GUIDE DIRECTORY Emojis & Art | Info Megathreads HOLES PING GROUPSCURRENT EVENTS:
KHive Fortification
Create banners and sidebars, badges and coins abound!Find Rightoid Infighting
500 mbux per post, no limitDrama: any incident, scene, gaffe, rumor, opinion, or disagreement that is blown entirely out of proportion.
Do your part to keep our community healthy by blowing everything out of proportion and making literally everything as dramatic as possible.
Rules:
- Asking to see who saved comments/posts=1 day ban
- You must be 18 or older to view this site.
- NO RIGHTWING AGENDAPOSTING.
- Discord users will be banned on sight.
- Don't post anything illegal.
- No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
- No doxxing.
- Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
- Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
- Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
- Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
- Absolutely NO misgendering.
- Absolutely NO antisemitism.
- Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
- You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
- You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
- You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
- You are encouraged to egg people on to transition or otherwise make drastic life changes.
- This site is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever.
Related subreddits:
πππ«π© π°π¨π³ ππ«π
Live commit: 6377678
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is this really the reading comprehension level of the average rightoid? There is nothing in that paragraph that says that literal force is required for there to be a response of force to intolerance.
You really have to be fricking dumb to not understand that preaching intolerance is not an act of physical force right?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is immediately following a lengthy argument whereby Popper specifies the necessary level of intolerance to trigger suppression:
I.E. "intolerance" here should not be read in a vague sense but specifically means "people who won't tolerate hearing a contrary argument".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It very clearly states that they "MAY" do these things, not that any single one is a requirement. There would need to be context outside this paragraph to inform any further. Hence, that paragraph does not supply the contradiction you believe it does.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context