Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She is a journ*list, worse yet, a sport journ*list, of course she is stupid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's what is so remarkable about her. Even when controlling for the fact she's a sports journ*list she still consistently stands out as terrible

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

diversity hire :marseymanysuchcases:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I noticed the NBA has two types of women sports journos: the ones who clearly had to over compensate and are Uber-nerds about basketball to the point of being overly technical and the over confident girl who doesn't know shit but that doesn't stop her!

With men the dumb ones are usually the color guys, usually ex-athletes and are funny.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hockey foids tend to be ok. They're inoffensive and lay off the hot takes. Hockey in the states doesn't get too many Stephen A. type characters, which helps

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ex-players screaming about how they, a decent role player, would be the best player in the league since it’s soft now is my favorite e

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Seriously, i could just imagine myself being a TV commentator for my own job, I would act like I knew every important thing about x cuz being hyper critical is easy

Being a good teacher/expert at your job != being a good communicator

You could be amazing at your job and still suck because you'll inherently hate every substandard player and think you know better, without ever spending time thinking how to make them not suck with words

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.