Reported by:

One based thot decides to compare escorts monthly income by BMI, fat hookers immediately have a coronary event.

https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/1599169132880343040

How dare you use maths to assign us a numerical value:

Why are you doing something this offensive to a community that u just became a part of??

![](/images/16703349597801986.webp)

The thot civil war will not include a lot of cardio:

Bmi is so wildly inconsistent. I am disgusted by this. You’re pitting SWers against each other by weight and income?

Hole methodolgy usage would probably help them make more money tbh:

I’m no statistician, but the holes in this methodology are truly incredible. Not to mention the use of BMI, which is a hugely stigmatising metric that fat people have asked people to stop using FOREVER. There are better uses of your time than whatever this is.

Foid v foid catty remarks are always so much fun:

dunno if you have the research qualifications for something with such heavy implications; SW solidarity is something I'd be researching too, but that's just my opinion and I could be wrong guessing you are pretty new; also it's <19 not >19 if you wanna get fatphobia correct


You just love being loud and wrong, huh? I’m honestly impressed at the way you manage to make every tweet worse than the last πŸ™ƒ

![](/images/16703356056114633.webp)

Link.

213
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If those queens want that bag, they need to anorexiamaxx asap. :marseynails:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Turns out no. There's an optimal BMI where income is maximised. If you get fatter or skinnier than that you start earning less (statistically).

Fatties AND anorexoids btfo.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Men don't want to frick skeletons nor whales, fascinating. :marseynotes:


:!marseybooba:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gosh I'm starting to think that the "healthy" BMI range wasn't named at random

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There is a hidden variable of meth addiction that wasn’t included in the regression, we will need to run it again. Possibly sample for the amount of teeth in their mouth to avoid sampling bias undercounting meth use. :marseynotes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Girl gotta have a lil cake on her know what im saying

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Um sweetie why are you disregarding my lived experiences. Your sexist data probably comes from nazis.

![](/images/16703376709901462.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.