Reported by:
- pizzashill-2570 : I expected better from Pizzashill than to screenpost
- pizzashill-6504 : Namestrag without a festive seasonal alt. Pls ban for being a grinch.
Schizo calls to end US constitution because twitter was mean to him
- 117
- 105
Top Poster of the Day:
pizzashill-9978
Current Registered Users: 25,589
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Live commit: f59b0e4
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
People who think this is a call to end the constitution are unironically too stupid to be qualified as voters. If you're THIS bad at critical thinking, you probably select your candidates on the basis of their eye colour or whether (or not) they think trans lives matter.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hes literally saying the rules in the consitution shouldn't apply.
Why? Because he lost an election and failed to steal it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hold on hoss, not to jump on you, but I think DDR's underlying point - poorly worded as always - is that if a good number of voters knew what the Democrat Party was doing with Big Tech before the election, especially w/r/t Hunter's laptop, that would have changed their vote. And there is polling on that I saw, something like 10 percent of Biden voters would have changed their vote in 2020 if they had known what the scandal was. That's kind of a big deal, albeit something that's in the past now. DDR's wistful thinking is that, hey, because of this, shouldn't there be a mechanism for a re-do. That part is stupid, I'll agree.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's literally nothing that "big tech" could do to ever support what ddr is claiming here?
Most voters dont give one frick about this. Most voters do not care about hunters peepee pics.
The poll you're citing is also fricking laughable and the most loaded bullshit poll I have ever seen.
You'd have to be a genuine r-slur to think that poll was valid.
They literally asked "would you change your vote if you knew Joe biden was a corrupt criminal dealing in China" and then claimed it was valid.
You cant make up an accusation in a poll and then ask people questions based on the made up premise.
"Would you vote for donald Trump if you knew he r*ped a child in africa??"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The fact that Big Tech, Twitter in particular, was prohibiting the spread of unflattering news to Joe Biden is what's being called a nothingburger by some today. That is precisely what they were doing.
And no, the laptop isn't the peepee pics, no one gives a shit about those. The laptop is about the alleged influence peddling by Hunter using his then-VP father who was then pocketing the rest. I'd agree the poll question was rather push-y, but it wasn't a fabricated accusation. The wording from the poll was long, however, it did sum up what was then-known about the actually relevant details of the laptop. If you want voters to make fully-informed decisions about their vote for president or anything else, having one political party pressure a private company where a not insignificant number of people get "news" tidbits directly interferes with that kind of voter decision-making.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The full laptop is available. There is not one shred of evidence for influence buying.
If there were, rightoids wouldn't spend 80% of their time trying to claim adult women were actually children.
Doesn't even get into the question: WHERE IN THE DOCUMENTS DOES IT SAY THE THE GOVERNMENT HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE LAPTOP STORY.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pizza just
I know you get your programming directly from lib rags but at least make some better content when running cover for the security state.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Literally show me the document that says the government was involved in the hunter biden story
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
BIPOC, the official narrative at the time was that the story had to be censored because the intelligence community flagged it as Russian misinformation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
At what point did you become an r-slur?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Theres literally no leak that amounts to more than a nothingburger.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Go back to reddit soyboy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
At the risk of sounding repetitive, I refer you to my foregoing comment
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context