Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The study was funded by an avocado group (lol).

And they didn't substitute avocado for similar foods; in one meal the substituted food was hilariously a brownie.

The top comment is calling out the study for being shit, which is rare on r/science, but it still hasn't stopped the submission getting 20k upvotes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

All studies are heckin' valid and peer reviews are violence

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

which is rare on r/science

It's also rare that the entire thread isn't one long sequence of [removed]. Have the jannies gone on strike?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's r/science, not r/AskScience. I'm not sure the former even has mods lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They are just slow but they usually remove almost all comments (deserved).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

which is rare on r/science

Lmao lies. The top comment on r/science is always some NEET going "well akshually this study is shit 😎", it just happens to be accurate this time.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The admins should ban r/science for this dangerous health misinformation.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

All studies are heckin' valid and peer reviews are violence

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.