Reported by:

:schopenmarsey: :marseybigbrain: ETHICS DEBATE #3: Now I Am Become Death :marseyoppenheimer: :marseynukegoggles:

Alright, no more discussion of the limits of free trade. Let's talk about technology. I saw a lively debate on here between @TheTroubleWithPibbles, @August, @Geralt_of_Uganda, etc, about whether it is ethical to develop technologies...

Scenario

This, of course, actually happened

J. Robert Oppenheimer was a brilliant scientist.

being so brilliant, he was able to conceive of, and help build, the greatest weapon known to mankind - the atomic bomb.

Oppenheimer, of course, didn't know the long term consequences of developing such a weapon - but he understood the sheer destructive potential of such a device.

Your question is: Was Oppenheimer acting ethically by assisting to develop the atomic bomb?

NOTE: In this hypothetical, history is at a crossroads. You don't know what will happen in the future - whether the device you created will be used to end life on earth or to usher in a new golden age.

138
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

DIMWIT. It was very ethical. This weapon, while destructive, could save the lives of many American soldiers. Sure, it might kill some enemy combatants, but that's just war for you. Liberals, SMH.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

R-SLUR. You didn't go far enough - it is extremely ethical. Oppenheimer was a dorky nerd while his nation was in a state of total war. Men were on the front lines bleeding and dying for his right to be a dorky nerd - it's only right that he help out in some way.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.